B

Wilsons Advisory And Stockbroking

5.2/10

z.com

7.9/10
4/10RegulationWinner7/10
2/10FeesWinner10/10
9/10PlatformsTied9/10
4/10Education & ResearchWinner10/10
4/10Deposits & WithdrawalsTied4/10
10/10SupportTied10/10

BrokerDataNet earns affiliate commission from brokers listed on this site. This does not affect our ratings or editorial independence.

Overview

Wilsons Advisory And Stockbroking was founded in 2008 and is headquartered in Australia, while z.com was established in 2008 and is based in UK. Wilsons Advisory And Stockbroking holds licences including Unregulated, while z.com is regulated by Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) among others. Wilsons Advisory And Stockbroking serves 10,000+ clients worldwide; z.com has 10,000+. The minimum deposit is $100 at Wilsons Advisory And Stockbroking and $50 at z.com.

z.com wins this category
FeatureWilsons Advisory And Stockbrokingz.com
Min. Deposit$100$50
RegulationUnregulatedFinancial Conduct Authority (FCA), Financial Services Authority (FSA), Securities and Futures Commission (SFC)
Founded20082008
CountryAustraliaUK
Clients10,000+10,000+

Fees

Fees are a critical factor when choosing between Wilsons Advisory And Stockbroking and z.com, directly affecting your bottom line as a trader. Wilsons Advisory And Stockbroking has a lower barrier to entry with a minimum deposit of $100 (vs $50 at z.com). Both brokers charge withdrawal fees. Wilsons Advisory And Stockbroking applies inactivity fees on dormant accounts; z.com does not. Wilsons Advisory And Stockbroking charges deposit fees; z.com does not. Overall, z.com scores higher on fees in our assessment.

z.com wins this category
FeatureWilsons Advisory And Stockbrokingz.com
Min. Deposit$100$50
Withdrawal FeesYesYes
Inactivity FeesYesNo
Deposit FeesYesYes
CFD FeesYesYes

Platforms

Wilsons Advisory And Stockbroking offers MT4, MT5, cTrader, while z.com supports MT4, MT5, cTrader. Both brokers provide mobile trading apps for iOS and Android. z.com supports social and copy trading features, which Wilsons Advisory And Stockbroking does not offer. The two brokers are closely matched on platform offering.

Tied
FeatureWilsons Advisory And Stockbrokingz.com
MT4YesYes
MT5YesYes
cTraderYesYes
Windows AppYesYes
iOS AppYesYes
Android AppYesYes
Trading PlatformsMetatrader 4 - desktop, iOS and Android versions available.Desktop,Android,Tablet,iPhone

Education & Research

Education and research tools help traders at every level make more informed decisions, and here's how Wilsons Advisory And Stockbroking and z.com compare. z.com runs regular live webinars; Wilsons Advisory And Stockbroking does not. Both provide video tutorials. z.com publishes daily market commentary; Wilsons Advisory And Stockbroking does not. Both integrate third-party research tools. z.com maintains an archive of past webinars for on-demand viewing. z.com scores higher overall in education and research.

z.com wins this category
FeatureWilsons Advisory And Stockbrokingz.com
Forex EducationYesYes
CFD EducationNoYes
Weekly WebinarsNoYes
Daily CommentaryNoYes
Trading CentralNoYes
AutochartistYesYes

Deposits & Withdrawals

Convenient deposit and withdrawal options reduce friction for traders, especially important when managing positions across time zones. Wilsons Advisory And Stockbroking accepts 2 of the tracked payment methods (bank transfer, credit/debit card), while z.com supports 2 (bank transfer, credit/debit card). Both brokers support the same set of payment methods.

Tied
FeatureWilsons Advisory And Stockbrokingz.com
Bank TransferYesYes
Credit CardYesYes
PayPalNoNo
SkrillNoNo
NetellerNoNo

Support

Responsive customer support matters most when you're locked out of your account or need urgent help with a trade. Both Wilsons Advisory And Stockbroking and z.com offer live chat support. Both provide phone support. Email support is available at both brokers. Both brokers offer support in 2 languages. Both brokers are comparable on support quality.

Tied
FeatureWilsons Advisory And Stockbrokingz.com
Live ChatYesYes
Phone SupportYesYes
Email SupportYesYes
LanguagesEnglish, and ChineseEnglish, and Chinese