B

Uniglobe Markets

5.6/10
World Forex Review logo

World Forex Review

6.9/10
3/10RegulationWinner4/10
10/10WinnerFees4/10
9/10PlatformsTied9/10
0/10Education & ResearchWinner10/10
4/10Deposits & WithdrawalsTied4/10
10/10SupportTied10/10

BrokerDataNet earns affiliate commission from brokers listed on this site. This does not affect our ratings or editorial independence.

Overview

Uniglobe Markets was founded in 2008 and is headquartered in Marshall Islands, while World Forex Review was established in 2008 and is based in Vanuatu. Uniglobe Markets holds licences including Unregulated, while World Forex Review is regulated by Vanuatu Financial Services Commission (VFSC) among others. Uniglobe Markets serves 10,000+ clients worldwide; World Forex Review has 10,000+. The minimum deposit is $10 at Uniglobe Markets and $100 at World Forex Review.

World Forex Review wins this category
FeatureUniglobe MarketsWorld Forex Review
Min. Deposit$10$100
RegulationUnregulatedVanuatu Financial Services Commission (VFSC)
Founded20082008
CountryMarshall IslandsVanuatu
Clients10,000+10,000+

Fees

Fees are a critical factor when choosing between Uniglobe Markets and World Forex Review, directly affecting your bottom line as a trader. Uniglobe Markets has a lower barrier to entry with a minimum deposit of $10 (vs $100 at World Forex Review). World Forex Review charges withdrawal fees while Uniglobe Markets does not, giving Uniglobe Markets an edge for frequent withdrawers. Uniglobe Markets charges deposit fees; World Forex Review does not. Overall, Uniglobe Markets scores higher on fees in our assessment.

Uniglobe Markets wins this category
FeatureUniglobe MarketsWorld Forex Review
Min. Deposit$10$100
Withdrawal FeesNoYes
Inactivity FeesNoNo
Deposit FeesYesYes
CFD FeesYesYes

Platforms

Uniglobe Markets offers MT4, MT5, cTrader, while World Forex Review supports MT4, MT5, cTrader. Both brokers provide mobile trading apps for iOS and Android. The two brokers are closely matched on platform offering.

Tied
FeatureUniglobe MarketsWorld Forex Review
MT4YesYes
MT5YesYes
cTraderYesYes
Windows AppYesYes
iOS AppYesYes
Android AppYesYes
Trading PlatformsWindows ├é┬¼├ó╦åÔÇÿ MacOS X. Multiple Terminal. Android. IOS.Android Apps,iPhone/iPad,Desktop

Education & Research

Education and research tools help traders at every level make more informed decisions, and here's how Uniglobe Markets and World Forex Review compare. World Forex Review runs regular live webinars; Uniglobe Markets does not. World Forex Review has a video library; Uniglobe Markets does not. World Forex Review publishes daily market commentary; Uniglobe Markets does not. World Forex Review integrates third-party research tools (Trading Central, Autochartist); Uniglobe Markets does not. World Forex Review maintains an archive of past webinars for on-demand viewing. World Forex Review scores higher overall in education and research.

World Forex Review wins this category
FeatureUniglobe MarketsWorld Forex Review
Forex EducationNoYes
CFD EducationNoYes
Weekly WebinarsNoYes
Daily CommentaryNoYes
Trading CentralNoYes
AutochartistNoYes

Deposits & Withdrawals

Convenient deposit and withdrawal options reduce friction for traders, especially important when managing positions across time zones. Uniglobe Markets accepts 2 of the tracked payment methods (bank transfer, credit/debit card), while World Forex Review supports 2 (bank transfer, credit/debit card). Both brokers support the same set of payment methods.

Tied
FeatureUniglobe MarketsWorld Forex Review
Bank TransferYesYes
Credit CardYesYes
PayPalNoNo
SkrillNoNo
NetellerNoNo

Support

Responsive customer support matters most when you're locked out of your account or need urgent help with a trade. Both Uniglobe Markets and World Forex Review offer live chat support. Both provide phone support. Email support is available at both brokers. Both brokers offer support in 2 languages. Both brokers are comparable on support quality.

Tied
FeatureUniglobe MarketsWorld Forex Review
Live ChatYesYes
Phone SupportYesYes
Email SupportYesYes
LanguagesEnglish, and ChineseEnglish, and Chinese