turbo forex
z.com
BrokerDataNet earns affiliate commission from brokers listed on this site. This does not affect our ratings or editorial independence.
Overview
turbo forex was founded in 2016 and is headquartered in United States, while z.com was established in 2008 and is based in UK. turbo forex holds licences including Your capital is at risk., while z.com is regulated by Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) among others. turbo forex serves 14,000+ clients worldwide; z.com has 10,000+. The minimum deposit is $250 at turbo forex and $50 at z.com.
| Feature | turbo forex | z.com |
|---|---|---|
| Min. Deposit | $250 | $50 |
| Regulation | Your capital is at risk. | Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), Financial Services Authority (FSA), Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) |
| Founded | 2016 | 2008 |
| Country | United States | UK |
| Clients | 14,000+ | 10,000+ |
Fees
Fees are a critical factor when choosing between turbo forex and z.com, directly affecting your bottom line as a trader. turbo forex has a lower barrier to entry with a minimum deposit of $250 (vs $50 at z.com). Both brokers charge withdrawal fees. turbo forex applies inactivity fees on dormant accounts; z.com does not. turbo forex charges deposit fees; z.com does not. Overall, z.com scores higher on fees in our assessment.
| Feature | turbo forex | z.com |
|---|---|---|
| Min. Deposit | $250 | $50 |
| Withdrawal Fees | Yes | Yes |
| Inactivity Fees | Yes | No |
| Deposit Fees | Yes | Yes |
| CFD Fees | Yes | Yes |
Platforms
z.com supports social and copy trading features, which turbo forex does not offer. z.com edges ahead on platform breadth and functionality in our scoring.
| Feature | turbo forex | z.com |
|---|---|---|
| MT4 | No | Yes |
| MT5 | No | Yes |
| cTrader | No | Yes |
| Windows App | No | Yes |
| iOS App | No | Yes |
| Android App | No | Yes |
| Trading Platforms | MT4, MT5, Mac, ZuluTrade, Web Trader, cTrader, Tablet & Mobile apps | Desktop,Android,Tablet,iPhone |
Education & Research
Education and research tools help traders at every level make more informed decisions, and here's how turbo forex and z.com compare. z.com runs regular live webinars; turbo forex does not. z.com has a video library; turbo forex does not. z.com publishes daily market commentary; turbo forex does not. z.com integrates third-party research tools (Trading Central, Autochartist); turbo forex does not. z.com maintains an archive of past webinars for on-demand viewing. z.com scores higher overall in education and research.
| Feature | turbo forex | z.com |
|---|---|---|
| Forex Education | No | Yes |
| CFD Education | No | Yes |
| Weekly Webinars | No | Yes |
| Daily Commentary | No | Yes |
| Trading Central | No | Yes |
| Autochartist | No | Yes |
Deposits & Withdrawals
Convenient deposit and withdrawal options reduce friction for traders, especially important when managing positions across time zones. turbo forex accepts 5 of the tracked payment methods (bank transfer, credit/debit card, PayPal, Skrill, Neteller), while z.com supports 2 (bank transfer, credit/debit card). turbo forex uniquely supports PayPal and Skrill and Neteller among the two brokers. turbo forex scores higher on deposit and withdrawal flexibility.
| Feature | turbo forex | z.com |
|---|---|---|
| Bank Transfer | Yes | Yes |
| Credit Card | Yes | Yes |
| PayPal | Yes | No |
| Skrill | Yes | No |
| Neteller | Yes | No |
Support
Responsive customer support matters most when you're locked out of your account or need urgent help with a trade. Both turbo forex and z.com offer live chat support. Both provide phone support. Email support is available at both brokers. turbo forex supports 8 languages and z.com supports 2, giving turbo forex broader global reach. Both brokers are comparable on support quality.
| Feature | turbo forex | z.com |
|---|---|---|
| Live Chat | Yes | Yes |
| Phone Support | Yes | Yes |
| Email Support | Yes | Yes |
| Languages | English, Spanish, Polish, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, Vietnamese, and Arabic | English, and Chinese |