Swissquote
z.com
BrokerDataNet earns affiliate commission from brokers listed on this site. This does not affect our ratings or editorial independence.
Overview
Swissquote was founded in 1999 and is headquartered in Switzerland, while z.com was established in 2008 and is based in UK. Both brokers are regulated by Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), among other authorities. Swissquote serves 300,000+ clients worldwide; z.com has 10,000+. The minimum deposit is $0 at Swissquote and $50 at z.com.
| Feature | Swissquote | z.com |
|---|---|---|
| Min. Deposit | $0 | $50 |
| Regulation | Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) | Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), Financial Services Authority (FSA), Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) |
| Founded | 1999 | 2008 |
| Country | Switzerland | UK |
| Clients | 300,000+ | 10,000+ |
Fees
Fees are a critical factor when choosing between Swissquote and z.com, directly affecting your bottom line as a trader. Swissquote has a lower barrier to entry with a minimum deposit of $0 (vs $50 at z.com). z.com charges withdrawal fees while Swissquote does not, giving Swissquote an edge for frequent withdrawers. z.com charges deposit fees; Swissquote does not. The two brokers are broadly comparable on fee structure.
| Feature | Swissquote | z.com |
|---|---|---|
| Min. Deposit | $0 | $50 |
| Withdrawal Fees | No | Yes |
| Inactivity Fees | No | No |
| Deposit Fees | No | Yes |
| CFD Fees | No | Yes |
Platforms
Swissquote offers MT5, cTrader, while z.com supports MT4, MT5, cTrader. Both brokers provide mobile trading apps for iOS and Android. Both brokers support copy or social trading, catering to less hands-on investors. z.com edges ahead on platform breadth and functionality in our scoring.
| Feature | Swissquote | z.com |
|---|---|---|
| MT4 | No | Yes |
| MT5 | Yes | Yes |
| cTrader | Yes | Yes |
| Windows App | Yes | Yes |
| iOS App | Yes | Yes |
| Android App | Yes | Yes |
| Trading Platforms | MT4, MT5, ZuluTrade, Web Trader, Tablet & Mobile apps | Desktop,Android,Tablet,iPhone |
Education & Research
Education and research tools help traders at every level make more informed decisions, and here's how Swissquote and z.com compare. z.com runs regular live webinars; Swissquote does not. Both provide video tutorials. z.com publishes daily market commentary; Swissquote does not. Both integrate third-party research tools. z.com maintains an archive of past webinars for on-demand viewing. z.com scores higher overall in education and research.
| Feature | Swissquote | z.com |
|---|---|---|
| Forex Education | Yes | Yes |
| CFD Education | No | Yes |
| Weekly Webinars | No | Yes |
| Daily Commentary | No | Yes |
| Trading Central | No | Yes |
| Autochartist | Yes | Yes |
Deposits & Withdrawals
Convenient deposit and withdrawal options reduce friction for traders, especially important when managing positions across time zones. Swissquote accepts 2 of the tracked payment methods (bank transfer, credit/debit card), while z.com supports 2 (bank transfer, credit/debit card). Both brokers support the same set of payment methods.
| Feature | Swissquote | z.com |
|---|---|---|
| Bank Transfer | Yes | Yes |
| Credit Card | Yes | Yes |
| PayPal | No | No |
| Skrill | No | No |
| Neteller | No | No |
Support
Responsive customer support matters most when you're locked out of your account or need urgent help with a trade. Both Swissquote and z.com offer live chat support. Both provide phone support. Email support is available at both brokers. Swissquote supports 8 languages and z.com supports 2, giving Swissquote broader global reach. Both brokers are comparable on support quality.
| Feature | Swissquote | z.com |
|---|---|---|
| Live Chat | Yes | Yes |
| Phone Support | Yes | Yes |
| Email Support | Yes | Yes |
| Languages | English, German, French, Italian, Spanish, Arabic, Russian, and Chinese | English, and Chinese |