B

PaxForex

7.6/10
Saxo Markets logo

Saxo Markets

6.1/10
6/10RegulationWinner7/10
10/10WinnerFees0/10
9/10PlatformsTied9/10
10/10WinnerEducation & Research4/10
7.5/10WinnerDeposits & Withdrawals4/10
10/10SupportTied10/10

BrokerDataNet earns affiliate commission from brokers listed on this site. This does not affect our ratings or editorial independence.

Overview

PaxForex was founded in 2011 and is headquartered in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, while Saxo Markets was established in 2012 and is based in Denmark. PaxForex holds licences including Financial Services Authority (FSA), while Saxo Markets is regulated by Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) among others. PaxForex serves 350+ clients worldwide; Saxo Markets has 10,000+. The minimum deposit is $10 at PaxForex and $6500 at Saxo Markets.

PaxForex wins this category
FeaturePaxForexSaxo Markets
Min. Deposit$10$6500
RegulationFinancial Services Authority (FSA), Registration Number 21973 IBC 2014 1825Financial Conduct Authority (FCA)
Founded20112012
CountrySaint Vincent and the GrenadinesDenmark
Clients350+10,000+

Fees

Fees are a critical factor when choosing between PaxForex and Saxo Markets, directly affecting your bottom line as a trader. PaxForex has a lower barrier to entry with a minimum deposit of $10 (vs $6500 at Saxo Markets). Both brokers charge withdrawal fees. Saxo Markets applies inactivity fees on dormant accounts; PaxForex does not. PaxForex charges deposit fees; Saxo Markets does not. Overall, PaxForex scores higher on fees in our assessment.

PaxForex wins this category
FeaturePaxForexSaxo Markets
Min. Deposit$10$6500
Withdrawal FeesYesYes
Inactivity FeesNoYes
Deposit FeesYesNo
CFD FeesNoNo

Platforms

PaxForex offers MT4, MT5, cTrader, while Saxo Markets supports MT4, MT5, cTrader. Both brokers provide mobile trading apps for iOS and Android. Both brokers support copy or social trading, catering to less hands-on investors. The two brokers are closely matched on platform offering.

Tied
FeaturePaxForexSaxo Markets
MT4YesYes
MT5YesYes
cTraderYesYes
Windows AppYesYes
iOS AppYesYes
Android AppYesYes
Trading PlatformsWeb, iPad, mac, Desktop, iPhone iOSMac, Web Trader, Tablet & Mobile apps

Education & Research

Education and research tools help traders at every level make more informed decisions, and here's how PaxForex and Saxo Markets compare. PaxForex runs regular live webinars; Saxo Markets does not. Both provide video tutorials. PaxForex publishes daily market commentary; Saxo Markets does not. Both integrate third-party research tools. PaxForex maintains an archive of past webinars for on-demand viewing. PaxForex scores higher overall in education and research.

PaxForex wins this category
FeaturePaxForexSaxo Markets
Forex EducationYesYes
CFD EducationYesNo
Weekly WebinarsYesNo
Daily CommentaryYesNo
Trading CentralYesNo
AutochartistYesYes

Deposits & Withdrawals

Convenient deposit and withdrawal options reduce friction for traders, especially important when managing positions across time zones. PaxForex accepts 4 of the tracked payment methods (bank transfer, credit/debit card, Skrill, Neteller), while Saxo Markets supports 2 (bank transfer, credit/debit card). PaxForex uniquely supports Skrill and Neteller among the two brokers. PaxForex scores higher on deposit and withdrawal flexibility.

PaxForex wins this category
FeaturePaxForexSaxo Markets
Bank TransferYesYes
Credit CardYesYes
PayPalNoNo
SkrillYesNo
NetellerYesNo

Support

Responsive customer support matters most when you're locked out of your account or need urgent help with a trade. Both PaxForex and Saxo Markets offer live chat support. Both provide phone support. Email support is available at both brokers. PaxForex supports 15 languages and Saxo Markets supports 2, giving PaxForex broader global reach. Both brokers are comparable on support quality.

Tied
FeaturePaxForexSaxo Markets
Live ChatYesYes
Phone SupportYesYes
Email SupportYesYes
LanguagesEnglish, Spanish, Czech, Chinese, German, French, Italian, Polish, Portuguese, Romanian, Slovenian,Hindi, Hebrew, Arabic, RussianEnglish, and Chinese