B
Oinvest logo

Oinvest

5.7/10

Wilsons Advisory And Stockbroking

5.2/10
5/10WinnerRegulation4/10
6/10WinnerFees2/10
7/10PlatformsWinner9/10
4/10Education & ResearchTied4/10
4/10Deposits & WithdrawalsTied4/10
10/10SupportTied10/10

BrokerDataNet earns affiliate commission from brokers listed on this site. This does not affect our ratings or editorial independence.

Overview

Oinvest was founded in 2019 and is headquartered in South Africa, while Wilsons Advisory And Stockbroking was established in 2008 and is based in Australia. Oinvest holds licences including Southern African Financial Sector Conduct Authority (FSCA), while Wilsons Advisory And Stockbroking is regulated by Unregulated among others. Oinvest serves 10,000+ clients worldwide; Wilsons Advisory And Stockbroking has 10,000+. The minimum deposit is $200 at Oinvest and $100 at Wilsons Advisory And Stockbroking.

Oinvest wins this category
FeatureOinvestWilsons Advisory And Stockbroking
Min. Deposit$200$100
RegulationSouthern African Financial Sector Conduct Authority (FSCA)Unregulated
Founded20192008
CountrySouth AfricaAustralia
Clients10,000+10,000+

Fees

Fees are a critical factor when choosing between Oinvest and Wilsons Advisory And Stockbroking, directly affecting your bottom line as a trader. Wilsons Advisory And Stockbroking has a lower barrier to entry with a minimum deposit of $100 (vs $200 at Oinvest). Wilsons Advisory And Stockbroking charges withdrawal fees while Oinvest does not, giving Oinvest an edge for frequent withdrawers. Both brokers charge inactivity fees on dormant accounts, worth noting if you trade infrequently. Wilsons Advisory And Stockbroking charges deposit fees; Oinvest does not. Overall, Oinvest scores higher on fees in our assessment.

Oinvest wins this category
FeatureOinvestWilsons Advisory And Stockbroking
Min. Deposit$200$100
Withdrawal FeesNoYes
Inactivity FeesYesYes
Deposit FeesNoYes
CFD FeesYesYes

Platforms

Oinvest offers MT5, cTrader, while Wilsons Advisory And Stockbroking supports MT4, MT5, cTrader. Both brokers provide mobile trading apps for iOS and Android. Oinvest supports social and copy trading features, which Wilsons Advisory And Stockbroking does not offer. Wilsons Advisory And Stockbroking edges ahead on platform breadth and functionality in our scoring.

Wilsons Advisory And Stockbroking wins this category
FeatureOinvestWilsons Advisory And Stockbroking
MT4NoYes
MT5YesYes
cTraderYesYes
Windows AppYesYes
iOS AppYesYes
Android AppYesYes
Trading PlatformsMT4, iOS, MacBook, iPhoneMetatrader 4 - desktop, iOS and Android versions available.

Education & Research

Education and research tools help traders at every level make more informed decisions, and here's how Oinvest and Wilsons Advisory And Stockbroking compare. Both provide video tutorials. Both integrate third-party research tools. The two brokers are evenly matched on educational content.

Tied
FeatureOinvestWilsons Advisory And Stockbroking
Forex EducationYesYes
CFD EducationNoNo
Weekly WebinarsNoNo
Daily CommentaryNoNo
Trading CentralNoNo
AutochartistYesYes

Deposits & Withdrawals

Convenient deposit and withdrawal options reduce friction for traders, especially important when managing positions across time zones. Oinvest accepts 2 of the tracked payment methods (bank transfer, credit/debit card), while Wilsons Advisory And Stockbroking supports 2 (bank transfer, credit/debit card). Both brokers support the same set of payment methods.

Tied
FeatureOinvestWilsons Advisory And Stockbroking
Bank TransferYesYes
Credit CardYesYes
PayPalNoNo
SkrillNoNo
NetellerNoNo

Support

Responsive customer support matters most when you're locked out of your account or need urgent help with a trade. Both Oinvest and Wilsons Advisory And Stockbroking offer live chat support. Both provide phone support. Email support is available at both brokers. Both brokers offer support in 2 languages. Both brokers are comparable on support quality.

Tied
FeatureOinvestWilsons Advisory And Stockbroking
Live ChatYesYes
Phone SupportYesYes
Email SupportYesYes
LanguagesEnglish, and ChineseEnglish, and Chinese