B
OANDA logo

OANDA

8.2/10

umarkets

7/10
9/10RegulationWinner10/10
10/10WinnerFees0/10
9/10PlatformsTied9/10
6/10WinnerEducation & Research4/10
4/10Deposits & WithdrawalsWinner10/10
10/10SupportTied10/10

BrokerDataNet earns affiliate commission from brokers listed on this site. This does not affect our ratings or editorial independence.

Overview

OANDA was founded in 1996 and is headquartered in United States, Canada, while umarkets was established in 2018 and is based in Bulgaria. Both brokers are regulated by Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), among other authorities. OANDA serves 10,000+ clients worldwide; umarkets has 10,000+. The minimum deposit is $1 at OANDA and $250 at umarkets.

OANDA wins this category
FeatureOANDAumarkets
Min. Deposit$1$250
RegulationFinancial Conduct Authority (FCA), Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC)Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC), Dubai Financial Services Authority (DFSA), Pepperstone Markets Limited is incorporated in The Bahamas (number 177174 B), Licensed by the Securities Commission of The Bahamas (SCB) number SIA-F333
Founded19962018
CountryUnited States, CanadaBulgaria
Clients10,000+10,000+

Fees

Fees are a critical factor when choosing between OANDA and umarkets, directly affecting your bottom line as a trader. OANDA has a lower barrier to entry with a minimum deposit of $1 (vs $250 at umarkets). umarkets charges withdrawal fees while OANDA does not, giving OANDA an edge for frequent withdrawers. umarkets applies inactivity fees on dormant accounts; OANDA does not. Overall, OANDA scores higher on fees in our assessment.

OANDA wins this category
FeatureOANDAumarkets
Min. Deposit$1$250
Withdrawal FeesNoYes
Inactivity FeesNoYes
Deposit FeesNoNo
CFD FeesNoNo

Platforms

OANDA offers MT4, MT5, cTrader, while umarkets supports MT4, MT5, cTrader. Both brokers provide mobile trading apps for iOS and Android. umarkets supports social and copy trading features, which OANDA does not offer. The two brokers are closely matched on platform offering.

Tied
FeatureOANDAumarkets
MT4YesYes
MT5YesYes
cTraderYesYes
Windows AppYesYes
iOS AppYesYes
Android AppYesYes
Trading PlatformsMT4, OANDA Desktop, OANDA Web, OANDA MobileMT4, MT5, Mac, ZuluTrade, Web Trader, cTrader, Tablet & Mobile apps

Education & Research

Education and research tools help traders at every level make more informed decisions, and here's how OANDA and umarkets compare. OANDA runs regular live webinars; umarkets does not. Both provide video tutorials. OANDA publishes daily market commentary; umarkets does not. Both integrate third-party research tools. OANDA maintains an archive of past webinars for on-demand viewing. OANDA scores higher overall in education and research.

OANDA wins this category
FeatureOANDAumarkets
Forex EducationNoYes
CFD EducationYesNo
Weekly WebinarsYesNo
Daily CommentaryYesNo
Trading CentralYesNo
AutochartistNoYes

Deposits & Withdrawals

Convenient deposit and withdrawal options reduce friction for traders, especially important when managing positions across time zones. OANDA accepts 2 of the tracked payment methods (bank transfer, credit/debit card), while umarkets supports 5 (bank transfer, credit/debit card, PayPal, Skrill, Neteller). umarkets uniquely supports PayPal and Skrill and Neteller among the two brokers. umarkets scores higher on deposit and withdrawal flexibility.

umarkets wins this category
FeatureOANDAumarkets
Bank TransferYesYes
Credit CardYesYes
PayPalNoYes
SkrillNoYes
NetellerNoYes

Support

Responsive customer support matters most when you're locked out of your account or need urgent help with a trade. Both OANDA and umarkets offer live chat support. Both provide phone support. Email support is available at both brokers. OANDA supports 2 languages and umarkets supports 8, giving umarkets broader global reach. Both brokers are comparable on support quality.

Tied
FeatureOANDAumarkets
Live ChatYesYes
Phone SupportYesYes
Email SupportYesYes
LanguagesEnglish, and ChineseEnglish, Spanish, Polish, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, Vietnamese, and Arabic