OANDA
UFX
BrokerDataNet earns affiliate commission from brokers listed on this site. This does not affect our ratings or editorial independence.
Overview
OANDA was founded in 1996 and is headquartered in United States, Canada, while UFX was established in 2007 and is based in Republic of Vanuatu. OANDA holds licences including Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), while UFX is regulated by Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC) among others. OANDA serves 10,000+ clients worldwide; UFX has 10,000+. The minimum deposit is $1 at OANDA and $500 at UFX.
| Feature | OANDA | UFX |
|---|---|---|
| Min. Deposit | $1 | $500 |
| Regulation | Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC) | Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC) |
| Founded | 1996 | 2007 |
| Country | United States, Canada | Republic of Vanuatu |
| Clients | 10,000+ | 10,000+ |
Fees
Fees are a critical factor when choosing between OANDA and UFX, directly affecting your bottom line as a trader. OANDA has a lower barrier to entry with a minimum deposit of $1 (vs $500 at UFX). UFX charges withdrawal fees while OANDA does not, giving OANDA an edge for frequent withdrawers. Overall, OANDA scores higher on fees in our assessment.
| Feature | OANDA | UFX |
|---|---|---|
| Min. Deposit | $1 | $500 |
| Withdrawal Fees | No | Yes |
| Inactivity Fees | No | No |
| Deposit Fees | No | No |
| CFD Fees | No | No |
Platforms
OANDA offers MT4, MT5, cTrader, while UFX supports MT5, cTrader. Both brokers provide mobile trading apps for iOS and Android. UFX supports social and copy trading features, which OANDA does not offer. OANDA edges ahead on platform breadth and functionality in our scoring.
| Feature | OANDA | UFX |
|---|---|---|
| MT4 | Yes | No |
| MT5 | Yes | Yes |
| cTrader | Yes | Yes |
| Windows App | Yes | Yes |
| iOS App | Yes | Yes |
| Android App | Yes | Yes |
| Trading Platforms | MT4, OANDA Desktop, OANDA Web, OANDA Mobile | MT4, Web Trader, Tablet & Mobile apps |
Education & Research
Education and research tools help traders at every level make more informed decisions, and here's how OANDA and UFX compare. OANDA runs regular live webinars; UFX does not. Both provide video tutorials. OANDA publishes daily market commentary; UFX does not. Both integrate third-party research tools. OANDA maintains an archive of past webinars for on-demand viewing. OANDA scores higher overall in education and research.
| Feature | OANDA | UFX |
|---|---|---|
| Forex Education | No | Yes |
| CFD Education | Yes | No |
| Weekly Webinars | Yes | No |
| Daily Commentary | Yes | No |
| Trading Central | Yes | No |
| Autochartist | No | Yes |
Deposits & Withdrawals
Convenient deposit and withdrawal options reduce friction for traders, especially important when managing positions across time zones. OANDA accepts 2 of the tracked payment methods (bank transfer, credit/debit card), while UFX supports 2 (bank transfer, credit/debit card). Both brokers support the same set of payment methods.
| Feature | OANDA | UFX |
|---|---|---|
| Bank Transfer | Yes | Yes |
| Credit Card | Yes | Yes |
| PayPal | No | No |
| Skrill | No | No |
| Neteller | No | No |
Support
Responsive customer support matters most when you're locked out of your account or need urgent help with a trade. Both OANDA and UFX offer live chat support. Both provide phone support. Email support is available at both brokers. Both brokers offer support in 2 languages. Both brokers are comparable on support quality.
| Feature | OANDA | UFX |
|---|---|---|
| Live Chat | Yes | Yes |
| Phone Support | Yes | Yes |
| Email Support | Yes | Yes |
| Languages | English, and Chinese | English, and Chinese |