B

npbfx

7.4/10
XGLOBAL Markets logo

XGLOBAL Markets

5.6/10
10/10WinnerRegulation5/10
0/10FeesTied0/10
9/10PlatformsTied9/10
4/10Education & ResearchTied4/10
10/10WinnerDeposits & Withdrawals4/10
10/10SupportTied10/10

BrokerDataNet earns affiliate commission from brokers listed on this site. This does not affect our ratings or editorial independence.

Overview

npbfx was founded in 2020 and is headquartered in United Kingdom, while XGLOBAL Markets was established in 2008 and is based in Cyprus. npbfx holds licences including Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), while XGLOBAL Markets is regulated by Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC) among others. npbfx serves 3,500,000+ clients worldwide; XGLOBAL Markets has 10,000+. The minimum deposit is $250 at npbfx and $500 at XGLOBAL Markets.

npbfx wins this category
FeaturenpbfxXGLOBAL Markets
Min. Deposit$250$500
RegulationFinancial Conduct Authority (FCA), Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC), Dubai Financial Services Authority (DFSA), Pepperstone Markets Limited is incorporated in The Bahamas (number 177174 B), Licensed by the Securities Commission of The Bahamas (SCB) number SIA-F287Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC)
Founded20202008
CountryUnited KingdomCyprus
Clients3,500,000+10,000+

Fees

Fees are a critical factor when choosing between npbfx and XGLOBAL Markets, directly affecting your bottom line as a trader. npbfx has a lower barrier to entry with a minimum deposit of $250 (vs $500 at XGLOBAL Markets). XGLOBAL Markets charges withdrawal fees while npbfx does not, giving npbfx an edge for frequent withdrawers. npbfx applies inactivity fees on dormant accounts; XGLOBAL Markets does not. XGLOBAL Markets charges deposit fees; npbfx does not. The two brokers are broadly comparable on fee structure.

Tied
FeaturenpbfxXGLOBAL Markets
Min. Deposit$250$500
Withdrawal FeesNoYes
Inactivity FeesYesNo
Deposit FeesNoYes
CFD FeesNoNo

Platforms

npbfx offers MT4, MT5, cTrader, while XGLOBAL Markets supports MT4, MT5, cTrader. Both brokers provide mobile trading apps for iOS and Android. npbfx supports social and copy trading features, which XGLOBAL Markets does not offer. The two brokers are closely matched on platform offering.

Tied
FeaturenpbfxXGLOBAL Markets
MT4YesYes
MT5YesYes
cTraderYesYes
Windows AppYesYes
iOS AppYesYes
Android AppYesYes
Trading PlatformsMT4, MT5, Mac, ZuluTrade, Web Trader, cTrader, Tablet & Mobile appsDesktop,iOS,Android

Education & Research

Education and research tools help traders at every level make more informed decisions, and here's how npbfx and XGLOBAL Markets compare. Both provide video tutorials. Both integrate third-party research tools. The two brokers are evenly matched on educational content.

Tied
FeaturenpbfxXGLOBAL Markets
Forex EducationYesYes
CFD EducationNoNo
Weekly WebinarsNoNo
Daily CommentaryNoNo
Trading CentralNoNo
AutochartistYesYes

Deposits & Withdrawals

Convenient deposit and withdrawal options reduce friction for traders, especially important when managing positions across time zones. npbfx accepts 5 of the tracked payment methods (bank transfer, credit/debit card, PayPal, Skrill, Neteller), while XGLOBAL Markets supports 2 (bank transfer, credit/debit card). npbfx uniquely supports PayPal and Skrill and Neteller among the two brokers. npbfx scores higher on deposit and withdrawal flexibility.

npbfx wins this category
FeaturenpbfxXGLOBAL Markets
Bank TransferYesYes
Credit CardYesYes
PayPalYesNo
SkrillYesNo
NetellerYesNo

Support

Responsive customer support matters most when you're locked out of your account or need urgent help with a trade. Both npbfx and XGLOBAL Markets offer live chat support. Both provide phone support. Email support is available at both brokers. npbfx supports 8 languages and XGLOBAL Markets supports 2, giving npbfx broader global reach. Both brokers are comparable on support quality.

Tied
FeaturenpbfxXGLOBAL Markets
Live ChatYesYes
Phone SupportYesYes
Email SupportYesYes
LanguagesEnglish, Spanish, Polish, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, Vietnamese, and ArabicEnglish, and Chinese