B

npbfx

7.4/10

Trading212

7.1/10
10/10RegulationTied10/10
0/10FeesWinner10/10
9/10PlatformsTied9/10
4/10Education & ResearchTied4/10
10/10WinnerDeposits & Withdrawals8/10
10/10WinnerSupport7/10

BrokerDataNet earns affiliate commission from brokers listed on this site. This does not affect our ratings or editorial independence.

Overview

npbfx was founded in 2020 and is headquartered in United Kingdom, while Trading212 was established in 2006 and is based in UK. Both brokers are regulated by Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), among other authorities. npbfx serves 3,500,000+ clients worldwide; Trading212 has 1,500,000+. The minimum deposit is $250 at npbfx and $1 at Trading212.

npbfx wins this category
FeaturenpbfxTrading212
Min. Deposit$250$1
RegulationFinancial Conduct Authority (FCA), Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC), Dubai Financial Services Authority (DFSA), Pepperstone Markets Limited is incorporated in The Bahamas (number 177174 B), Licensed by the Securities Commission of The Bahamas (SCB) number SIA-F287Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), Financial Supervision Commission (FSC)
Founded20202006
CountryUnited KingdomUK
Clients3,500,000+1,500,000+

Fees

Fees are a critical factor when choosing between npbfx and Trading212, directly affecting your bottom line as a trader. Trading212 has a lower barrier to entry with a minimum deposit of $1 (vs $250 at npbfx). Neither broker charges withdrawal fees. npbfx applies inactivity fees on dormant accounts; Trading212 does not. Overall, Trading212 scores higher on fees in our assessment.

Trading212 wins this category
FeaturenpbfxTrading212
Min. Deposit$250$1
Withdrawal FeesNoNo
Inactivity FeesYesNo
Deposit FeesNoNo
CFD FeesNoNo

Platforms

npbfx offers MT4, MT5, cTrader, while Trading212 supports MT4, MT5, cTrader. Both brokers provide mobile trading apps for iOS and Android. Both brokers support copy or social trading, catering to less hands-on investors. The two brokers are closely matched on platform offering.

Tied
FeaturenpbfxTrading212
MT4YesYes
MT5YesYes
cTraderYesYes
Windows AppYesYes
iOS AppYesYes
Android AppYesYes
Trading PlatformsMT4, MT5, Mac, ZuluTrade, Web Trader, cTrader, Tablet & Mobile appsMT4, MT5, Web Trader, Tablet & Mobile apps

Education & Research

Education and research tools help traders at every level make more informed decisions, and here's how npbfx and Trading212 compare. Both provide video tutorials. Both integrate third-party research tools. The two brokers are evenly matched on educational content.

Tied
FeaturenpbfxTrading212
Forex EducationYesYes
CFD EducationNoNo
Weekly WebinarsNoNo
Daily CommentaryNoNo
Trading CentralNoNo
AutochartistYesYes

Deposits & Withdrawals

Convenient deposit and withdrawal options reduce friction for traders, especially important when managing positions across time zones. npbfx accepts 5 of the tracked payment methods (bank transfer, credit/debit card, PayPal, Skrill, Neteller), while Trading212 supports 4 (bank transfer, credit/debit card, PayPal, Skrill). npbfx uniquely supports Neteller among the two brokers. npbfx scores higher on deposit and withdrawal flexibility.

npbfx wins this category
FeaturenpbfxTrading212
Bank TransferYesYes
Credit CardYesYes
PayPalYesYes
SkrillYesYes
NetellerYesNo

Support

Responsive customer support matters most when you're locked out of your account or need urgent help with a trade. Both npbfx and Trading212 offer live chat support. npbfx offers phone support; Trading212 does not. Email support is available at both brokers. npbfx supports 8 languages and Trading212 supports 13, giving Trading212 broader global reach. npbfx scores higher overall on customer support in our assessment.

npbfx wins this category
FeaturenpbfxTrading212
Live ChatYesYes
Phone SupportYesNo
Email SupportYesYes
LanguagesEnglish, Spanish, Polish, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, Vietnamese, and ArabicEnglish, German, Netherlands, Spanish, French, Italian, Polish, Serbian, Norwegian, Swedish, Czech, Romanian, Turkish