Nadex
umarkets
BrokerDataNet earns affiliate commission from brokers listed on this site. This does not affect our ratings or editorial independence.
Overview
Nadex was founded in 2008 and is headquartered in USA, while umarkets was established in 2018 and is based in Bulgaria. Nadex holds licences including Unregulated, while umarkets is regulated by Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) among others. Nadex serves 10,000+ clients worldwide; umarkets has 10,000+. Both brokers share the same minimum deposit of $250.
| Feature | Nadex | umarkets |
|---|---|---|
| Min. Deposit | $250 | $250 |
| Regulation | Unregulated | Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC), Dubai Financial Services Authority (DFSA), Pepperstone Markets Limited is incorporated in The Bahamas (number 177174 B), Licensed by the Securities Commission of The Bahamas (SCB) number SIA-F333 |
| Founded | 2008 | 2018 |
| Country | USA | Bulgaria |
| Clients | 10,000+ | 10,000+ |
Fees
Fees are a critical factor when choosing between Nadex and umarkets, directly affecting your bottom line as a trader. Both require a minimum deposit of $250. umarkets charges withdrawal fees while Nadex does not, giving Nadex an edge for frequent withdrawers. Both brokers charge inactivity fees on dormant accounts, worth noting if you trade infrequently. The two brokers are broadly comparable on fee structure.
| Feature | Nadex | umarkets |
|---|---|---|
| Min. Deposit | $250 | $250 |
| Withdrawal Fees | No | Yes |
| Inactivity Fees | Yes | Yes |
| Deposit Fees | No | No |
| CFD Fees | Yes | No |
Platforms
Nadex offers MT5, cTrader, while umarkets supports MT4, MT5, cTrader. Both brokers provide mobile trading apps for iOS and Android. Both brokers support copy or social trading, catering to less hands-on investors. umarkets edges ahead on platform breadth and functionality in our scoring.
| Feature | Nadex | umarkets |
|---|---|---|
| MT4 | No | Yes |
| MT5 | Yes | Yes |
| cTrader | Yes | Yes |
| Windows App | Yes | Yes |
| iOS App | Yes | Yes |
| Android App | Yes | Yes |
| Trading Platforms | Web,iPad,mac,Desktop,iPhoneiOS | MT4, MT5, Mac, ZuluTrade, Web Trader, cTrader, Tablet & Mobile apps |
Education & Research
Education and research tools help traders at every level make more informed decisions, and here's how Nadex and umarkets compare. umarkets has a video library; Nadex does not. umarkets integrates third-party research tools (Autochartist); Nadex does not. umarkets scores higher overall in education and research.
| Feature | Nadex | umarkets |
|---|---|---|
| Forex Education | No | Yes |
| CFD Education | No | No |
| Weekly Webinars | No | No |
| Daily Commentary | No | No |
| Trading Central | No | No |
| Autochartist | No | Yes |
Deposits & Withdrawals
Convenient deposit and withdrawal options reduce friction for traders, especially important when managing positions across time zones. Nadex accepts 2 of the tracked payment methods (bank transfer, credit/debit card), while umarkets supports 5 (bank transfer, credit/debit card, PayPal, Skrill, Neteller). umarkets uniquely supports PayPal and Skrill and Neteller among the two brokers. umarkets scores higher on deposit and withdrawal flexibility.
| Feature | Nadex | umarkets |
|---|---|---|
| Bank Transfer | Yes | Yes |
| Credit Card | Yes | Yes |
| PayPal | No | Yes |
| Skrill | No | Yes |
| Neteller | No | Yes |
Support
Responsive customer support matters most when you're locked out of your account or need urgent help with a trade. Both Nadex and umarkets offer live chat support. Both provide phone support. Email support is available at both brokers. Nadex supports 2 languages and umarkets supports 8, giving umarkets broader global reach. Both brokers are comparable on support quality.
| Feature | Nadex | umarkets |
|---|---|---|
| Live Chat | Yes | Yes |
| Phone Support | Yes | Yes |
| Email Support | Yes | Yes |
| Languages | English, and Chinese | English, Spanish, Polish, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, Vietnamese, and Arabic |