B
highlow logo

highlow

7.6/10
Zacks Trade logo

Zacks Trade

6.1/10
10/10WinnerRegulation3/10
0/10FeesTied0/10
9/10PlatformsTied9/10
4/10Education & ResearchWinner10/10
10/10WinnerDeposits & Withdrawals4/10
10/10SupportTied10/10

BrokerDataNet earns affiliate commission from brokers listed on this site. This does not affect our ratings or editorial independence.

Overview

highlow was founded in 2011 and is headquartered in Australia, while Zacks Trade was established in 2008 and is based in United States. highlow holds licences including Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), while Zacks Trade is regulated by Unregulated among others. highlow serves 150,000+ clients worldwide; Zacks Trade has 10,000+. The minimum deposit is $250 at highlow and $2500 at Zacks Trade.

highlow wins this category
FeaturehighlowZacks Trade
Min. Deposit$250$2500
RegulationFinancial Conduct Authority (FCA), Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC), Dubai Financial Services Authority (DFSA), Pepperstone Markets Limited is incorporated in The Bahamas (number 177174 B), Licensed by the Securities Commission of The Bahamas (SCB) number SIA-F254Unregulated
Founded20112008
CountryAustraliaUnited States
Clients150,000+10,000+

Fees

Fees are a critical factor when choosing between highlow and Zacks Trade, directly affecting your bottom line as a trader. highlow has a lower barrier to entry with a minimum deposit of $250 (vs $2500 at Zacks Trade). Neither broker charges withdrawal fees. highlow charges deposit fees; Zacks Trade does not. The two brokers are broadly comparable on fee structure.

Tied
FeaturehighlowZacks Trade
Min. Deposit$250$2500
Withdrawal FeesNoNo
Inactivity FeesNoNo
Deposit FeesYesYes
CFD FeesYesYes

Platforms

highlow offers MT4, MT5, cTrader, while Zacks Trade supports MT4, MT5, cTrader. Both brokers provide mobile trading apps for iOS and Android. highlow supports social and copy trading features, which Zacks Trade does not offer. The two brokers are closely matched on platform offering.

Tied
FeaturehighlowZacks Trade
MT4YesYes
MT5YesYes
cTraderYesYes
Windows AppYesYes
iOS AppYesYes
Android AppYesYes
Trading PlatformsMT4, MT5, Mac, ZuluTrade, Web Trader, cTrader, Tablet & Mobile appsAndroid,iPhone/iPad,Tablet

Education & Research

Education and research tools help traders at every level make more informed decisions, and here's how highlow and Zacks Trade compare. Zacks Trade runs regular live webinars; highlow does not. Both provide video tutorials. Zacks Trade publishes daily market commentary; highlow does not. Both integrate third-party research tools. Zacks Trade maintains an archive of past webinars for on-demand viewing. Zacks Trade scores higher overall in education and research.

Zacks Trade wins this category
FeaturehighlowZacks Trade
Forex EducationYesYes
CFD EducationNoYes
Weekly WebinarsNoYes
Daily CommentaryNoYes
Trading CentralNoYes
AutochartistYesYes

Deposits & Withdrawals

Convenient deposit and withdrawal options reduce friction for traders, especially important when managing positions across time zones. highlow accepts 5 of the tracked payment methods (bank transfer, credit/debit card, PayPal, Skrill, Neteller), while Zacks Trade supports 2 (bank transfer, credit/debit card). highlow uniquely supports PayPal and Skrill and Neteller among the two brokers. highlow scores higher on deposit and withdrawal flexibility.

highlow wins this category
FeaturehighlowZacks Trade
Bank TransferYesYes
Credit CardYesYes
PayPalYesNo
SkrillYesNo
NetellerYesNo

Support

Responsive customer support matters most when you're locked out of your account or need urgent help with a trade. Both highlow and Zacks Trade offer live chat support. Both provide phone support. Email support is available at both brokers. highlow supports 8 languages and Zacks Trade supports 2, giving highlow broader global reach. Both brokers are comparable on support quality.

Tied
FeaturehighlowZacks Trade
Live ChatYesYes
Phone SupportYesYes
Email SupportYesYes
LanguagesEnglish, Spanish, Polish, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, Vietnamese, and ArabicEnglish, and Chinese