B
Hantec Markets logo

Hantec Markets

5.6/10

Virtual Brokers

6.4/10
7/10RegulationTied7/10
1/10WinnerFees0/10
9/10PlatformsTied9/10
0/10Education & ResearchWinner10/10
4/10Deposits & WithdrawalsTied4/10
10/10SupportTied10/10

BrokerDataNet earns affiliate commission from brokers listed on this site. This does not affect our ratings or editorial independence.

Overview

Hantec Markets was founded in 1990 and is headquartered in UK, Hong Kong, while Virtual Brokers was established in 2008 and is based in Canada. Hantec Markets holds licences including Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), while Virtual Brokers is regulated by The Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada (IIROC) among others. Hantec Markets serves 10,000+ clients worldwide; Virtual Brokers has 10,000+. Both brokers share the same minimum deposit of $1000.

Virtual Brokers wins this category
FeatureHantec MarketsVirtual Brokers
Min. Deposit$1000$1000
RegulationFinancial Conduct Authority (FCA)The Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada (IIROC), Canadian Investor Protection Fund (CIPF)
Founded19902008
CountryUK, Hong KongCanada
Clients10,000+10,000+

Fees

Fees are a critical factor when choosing between Hantec Markets and Virtual Brokers, directly affecting your bottom line as a trader. Both require a minimum deposit of $1000. Virtual Brokers charges withdrawal fees while Hantec Markets does not, giving Hantec Markets an edge for frequent withdrawers. Virtual Brokers charges deposit fees; Hantec Markets does not. Overall, Hantec Markets scores higher on fees in our assessment.

Hantec Markets wins this category
FeatureHantec MarketsVirtual Brokers
Min. Deposit$1000$1000
Withdrawal FeesNoYes
Inactivity FeesNoNo
Deposit FeesNoYes
CFD FeesNoNo

Platforms

Hantec Markets offers MT4, MT5, cTrader, while Virtual Brokers supports MT4, MT5, cTrader. Both brokers provide mobile trading apps for iOS and Android. Virtual Brokers supports social and copy trading features, which Hantec Markets does not offer. The two brokers are closely matched on platform offering.

Tied
FeatureHantec MarketsVirtual Brokers
MT4YesYes
MT5YesYes
cTraderYesYes
Windows AppYesYes
iOS AppYesYes
Android AppYesYes
Trading PlatformsMT4, Mac, Web Trader, Currenex, Tablet & Mobile appsMT4,Desktop,iPhone/iOS

Education & Research

Education and research tools help traders at every level make more informed decisions, and here's how Hantec Markets and Virtual Brokers compare. Virtual Brokers runs regular live webinars; Hantec Markets does not. Virtual Brokers has a video library; Hantec Markets does not. Virtual Brokers publishes daily market commentary; Hantec Markets does not. Virtual Brokers integrates third-party research tools (Trading Central, Autochartist); Hantec Markets does not. Virtual Brokers maintains an archive of past webinars for on-demand viewing. Virtual Brokers scores higher overall in education and research.

Virtual Brokers wins this category
FeatureHantec MarketsVirtual Brokers
Forex EducationNoYes
CFD EducationNoYes
Weekly WebinarsNoYes
Daily CommentaryNoYes
Trading CentralNoYes
AutochartistNoYes

Deposits & Withdrawals

Convenient deposit and withdrawal options reduce friction for traders, especially important when managing positions across time zones. Hantec Markets accepts 2 of the tracked payment methods (bank transfer, credit/debit card), while Virtual Brokers supports 2 (bank transfer, credit/debit card). Both brokers support the same set of payment methods.

Tied
FeatureHantec MarketsVirtual Brokers
Bank TransferYesYes
Credit CardYesYes
PayPalNoNo
SkrillNoNo
NetellerNoNo

Support

Responsive customer support matters most when you're locked out of your account or need urgent help with a trade. Both Hantec Markets and Virtual Brokers offer live chat support. Both provide phone support. Email support is available at both brokers. Both brokers offer support in 2 languages. Both brokers are comparable on support quality.

Tied
FeatureHantec MarketsVirtual Brokers
Live ChatYesYes
Phone SupportYesYes
Email SupportYesYes
LanguagesEnglish, and ChineseEnglish, and Chinese