B
fbs inc logo

fbs inc

7.7/10

OptionWeb

6.4/10
10/10WinnerRegulation7/10
1/10FeesWinner8/10
7/10PlatformsTied7/10
6/10WinnerEducation & Research4/10
10/10WinnerDeposits & Withdrawals4/10
10/10SupportTied10/10

BrokerDataNet earns affiliate commission from brokers listed on this site. This does not affect our ratings or editorial independence.

Overview

fbs inc was founded in 2018 and is headquartered in Australia, while OptionWeb was established in 2012 and is based in Cyprus. fbs inc holds licences including Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), while OptionWeb is regulated by Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC) among others. fbs inc serves 10,000+ clients worldwide; OptionWeb has 10,000+. The minimum deposit is $250 at fbs inc and $200 at OptionWeb.

fbs inc wins this category
Featurefbs incOptionWeb
Min. Deposit$250$200
RegulationFinancial Conduct Authority (FCA), Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC), Dubai Financial Services Authority (DFSA), Pepperstone Markets Limited is incorporated in The Bahamas (number 177174 B), Licensed by the Securities Commission of The Bahamas (SCB) number SIA-F225Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC)
Founded20182012
CountryAustraliaCyprus
Clients10,000+10,000+

Fees

Fees are a critical factor when choosing between fbs inc and OptionWeb, directly affecting your bottom line as a trader. OptionWeb has a lower barrier to entry with a minimum deposit of $200 (vs $250 at fbs inc). Neither broker charges withdrawal fees. Overall, OptionWeb scores higher on fees in our assessment.

OptionWeb wins this category
Featurefbs incOptionWeb
Min. Deposit$250$200
Withdrawal FeesNoNo
Inactivity FeesNoNo
Deposit FeesNoNo
CFD FeesNoNo

Platforms

fbs inc offers MT5, cTrader, while OptionWeb supports MT5, cTrader. Both brokers provide mobile trading apps for iOS and Android. fbs inc supports social and copy trading features, which OptionWeb does not offer. The two brokers are closely matched on platform offering.

Tied
Featurefbs incOptionWeb
MT4NoNo
MT5YesYes
cTraderYesYes
Windows AppYesYes
iOS AppYesYes
Android AppYesYes
Trading PlatformsMT4, MT5, Mac, ZuluTrade, Web Trader, cTrader, Tablet & Mobile appsBinary, Tablet & Mobile apps

Education & Research

Education and research tools help traders at every level make more informed decisions, and here's how fbs inc and OptionWeb compare. fbs inc runs regular live webinars; OptionWeb does not. Both provide video tutorials. fbs inc publishes daily market commentary; OptionWeb does not. Both integrate third-party research tools. fbs inc maintains an archive of past webinars for on-demand viewing. fbs inc scores higher overall in education and research.

fbs inc wins this category
Featurefbs incOptionWeb
Forex EducationNoYes
CFD EducationYesNo
Weekly WebinarsYesNo
Daily CommentaryYesNo
Trading CentralYesNo
AutochartistNoYes

Deposits & Withdrawals

Convenient deposit and withdrawal options reduce friction for traders, especially important when managing positions across time zones. fbs inc accepts 5 of the tracked payment methods (bank transfer, credit/debit card, PayPal, Skrill, Neteller), while OptionWeb supports 2 (bank transfer, credit/debit card). fbs inc uniquely supports PayPal and Skrill and Neteller among the two brokers. fbs inc scores higher on deposit and withdrawal flexibility.

fbs inc wins this category
Featurefbs incOptionWeb
Bank TransferYesYes
Credit CardYesYes
PayPalYesNo
SkrillYesNo
NetellerYesNo

Support

Responsive customer support matters most when you're locked out of your account or need urgent help with a trade. Both fbs inc and OptionWeb offer live chat support. Both provide phone support. Email support is available at both brokers. fbs inc supports 8 languages and OptionWeb supports 2, giving fbs inc broader global reach. Both brokers are comparable on support quality.

Tied
Featurefbs incOptionWeb
Live ChatYesYes
Phone SupportYesYes
Email SupportYesYes
LanguagesEnglish, Spanish, Polish, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, Vietnamese, and ArabicEnglish, and Chinese