B
fbs inc logo

fbs inc

7.7/10
Invast Global logo

Invast Global

6.2/10
10/10WinnerRegulation7/10
1/10FeesTied1/10
7/10PlatformsWinner9/10
6/10WinnerEducation & Research4/10
10/10WinnerDeposits & Withdrawals4/10
10/10SupportTied10/10

BrokerDataNet earns affiliate commission from brokers listed on this site. This does not affect our ratings or editorial independence.

Overview

fbs inc was founded in 2018 and is headquartered in Australia, while Invast Global was established in 1960 and is based in Australia. fbs inc holds licences including Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), while Invast Global is regulated by Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC) among others. fbs inc serves 10,000+ clients worldwide; Invast Global has 10,000+. The minimum deposit is $250 at fbs inc and $25000 at Invast Global.

fbs inc wins this category
Featurefbs incInvast Global
Min. Deposit$250$25000
RegulationFinancial Conduct Authority (FCA), Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC), Dubai Financial Services Authority (DFSA), Pepperstone Markets Limited is incorporated in The Bahamas (number 177174 B), Licensed by the Securities Commission of The Bahamas (SCB) number SIA-F225Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC)
Founded20181960
CountryAustraliaAustralia
Clients10,000+10,000+

Fees

Fees are a critical factor when choosing between fbs inc and Invast Global, directly affecting your bottom line as a trader. fbs inc has a lower barrier to entry with a minimum deposit of $250 (vs $25000 at Invast Global). Neither broker charges withdrawal fees. The two brokers are broadly comparable on fee structure.

Tied
Featurefbs incInvast Global
Min. Deposit$250$25000
Withdrawal FeesNoNo
Inactivity FeesNoNo
Deposit FeesNoNo
CFD FeesNoNo

Platforms

fbs inc offers MT5, cTrader, while Invast Global supports MT4, MT5, cTrader. Both brokers provide mobile trading apps for iOS and Android. fbs inc supports social and copy trading features, which Invast Global does not offer. Invast Global edges ahead on platform breadth and functionality in our scoring.

Invast Global wins this category
Featurefbs incInvast Global
MT4NoYes
MT5YesYes
cTraderYesYes
Windows AppYesYes
iOS AppYesYes
Android AppYesYes
Trading PlatformsMT4, MT5, Mac, ZuluTrade, Web Trader, cTrader, Tablet & Mobile appsMT4,

Education & Research

Education and research tools help traders at every level make more informed decisions, and here's how fbs inc and Invast Global compare. fbs inc runs regular live webinars; Invast Global does not. Both provide video tutorials. fbs inc publishes daily market commentary; Invast Global does not. Both integrate third-party research tools. fbs inc maintains an archive of past webinars for on-demand viewing. fbs inc scores higher overall in education and research.

fbs inc wins this category
Featurefbs incInvast Global
Forex EducationNoYes
CFD EducationYesNo
Weekly WebinarsYesNo
Daily CommentaryYesNo
Trading CentralYesNo
AutochartistNoYes

Deposits & Withdrawals

Convenient deposit and withdrawal options reduce friction for traders, especially important when managing positions across time zones. fbs inc accepts 5 of the tracked payment methods (bank transfer, credit/debit card, PayPal, Skrill, Neteller), while Invast Global supports 2 (bank transfer, credit/debit card). fbs inc uniquely supports PayPal and Skrill and Neteller among the two brokers. fbs inc scores higher on deposit and withdrawal flexibility.

fbs inc wins this category
Featurefbs incInvast Global
Bank TransferYesYes
Credit CardYesYes
PayPalYesNo
SkrillYesNo
NetellerYesNo

Support

Responsive customer support matters most when you're locked out of your account or need urgent help with a trade. Both fbs inc and Invast Global offer live chat support. Both provide phone support. Email support is available at both brokers. fbs inc supports 8 languages and Invast Global supports 2, giving fbs inc broader global reach. Both brokers are comparable on support quality.

Tied
Featurefbs incInvast Global
Live ChatYesYes
Phone SupportYesYes
Email SupportYesYes
LanguagesEnglish, Spanish, Polish, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, Vietnamese, and ArabicEnglish, and Chinese