eOption
lqdfx
BrokerDataNet earns affiliate commission from brokers listed on this site. This does not affect our ratings or editorial independence.
Overview
eOption was founded in 2008 and is headquartered in USA, while lqdfx was established in 2017 and is based in Portugal. eOption holds licences including Unregulated, while lqdfx is regulated by Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) among others. eOption serves 10,000+ clients worldwide; lqdfx has 200,000+. The minimum deposit is $500 at eOption and $250 at lqdfx.
| Feature | eOption | lqdfx |
|---|---|---|
| Min. Deposit | $500 | $250 |
| Regulation | Unregulated | Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC), Dubai Financial Services Authority (DFSA), Pepperstone Markets Limited is incorporated in The Bahamas (number 177174 B), Licensed by the Securities Commission of The Bahamas (SCB) number SIA-F272 |
| Founded | 2008 | 2017 |
| Country | USA | Portugal |
| Clients | 10,000+ | 200,000+ |
Fees
Fees are a critical factor when choosing between eOption and lqdfx, directly affecting your bottom line as a trader. lqdfx has a lower barrier to entry with a minimum deposit of $250 (vs $500 at eOption). eOption charges withdrawal fees while lqdfx does not, a notable advantage for frequent withdrawers. eOption charges deposit fees; lqdfx does not. Overall, lqdfx scores higher on fees in our assessment.
| Feature | eOption | lqdfx |
|---|---|---|
| Min. Deposit | $500 | $250 |
| Withdrawal Fees | Yes | No |
| Inactivity Fees | No | No |
| Deposit Fees | Yes | No |
| CFD Fees | No | Yes |
Platforms
eOption offers MT4, MT5, cTrader, while lqdfx supports MT4, MT5, cTrader. Both brokers provide mobile trading apps for iOS and Android. The two brokers are closely matched on platform offering.
| Feature | eOption | lqdfx |
|---|---|---|
| MT4 | Yes | Yes |
| MT5 | Yes | Yes |
| cTrader | Yes | Yes |
| Windows App | Yes | Yes |
| iOS App | Yes | Yes |
| Android App | Yes | Yes |
| Trading Platforms | DealBook (Desktop, Mobile, iPhone, iPad, iPod touch, Web) | MT4, MT5, Mac, ZuluTrade, Web Trader, cTrader, Tablet & Mobile apps |
Education & Research
Education and research tools help traders at every level make more informed decisions, and here's how eOption and lqdfx compare. lqdfx runs regular live webinars; eOption does not. Both provide video tutorials. lqdfx publishes daily market commentary; eOption does not. Both integrate third-party research tools. lqdfx maintains an archive of past webinars for on-demand viewing. lqdfx scores higher overall in education and research.
| Feature | eOption | lqdfx |
|---|---|---|
| Forex Education | Yes | Yes |
| CFD Education | No | Yes |
| Weekly Webinars | No | Yes |
| Daily Commentary | No | Yes |
| Trading Central | No | Yes |
| Autochartist | Yes | Yes |
Deposits & Withdrawals
Convenient deposit and withdrawal options reduce friction for traders, especially important when managing positions across time zones. eOption accepts 2 of the tracked payment methods (bank transfer, credit/debit card), while lqdfx supports 5 (bank transfer, credit/debit card, PayPal, Skrill, Neteller). lqdfx uniquely supports PayPal and Skrill and Neteller among the two brokers. lqdfx scores higher on deposit and withdrawal flexibility.
| Feature | eOption | lqdfx |
|---|---|---|
| Bank Transfer | Yes | Yes |
| Credit Card | Yes | Yes |
| PayPal | No | Yes |
| Skrill | No | Yes |
| Neteller | No | Yes |
Support
Responsive customer support matters most when you're locked out of your account or need urgent help with a trade. Both eOption and lqdfx offer live chat support. Both provide phone support. Email support is available at both brokers. eOption supports 2 languages and lqdfx supports 8, giving lqdfx broader global reach. Both brokers are comparable on support quality.
| Feature | eOption | lqdfx |
|---|---|---|
| Live Chat | Yes | Yes |
| Phone Support | Yes | Yes |
| Email Support | Yes | Yes |
| Languages | English, and Chinese | English, Spanish, Polish, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, Vietnamese, and Arabic |