B

eOption

4.7/10

lightspeed

8.3/10
3/10RegulationWinner10/10
0/10FeesTied0/10
9/10PlatformsTied9/10
4/10Education & ResearchWinner10/10
4/10Deposits & WithdrawalsWinner10/10
10/10SupportTied10/10

BrokerDataNet earns affiliate commission from brokers listed on this site. This does not affect our ratings or editorial independence.

Overview

eOption was founded in 2008 and is headquartered in USA, while lightspeed was established in 2014 and is based in USA. eOption holds licences including Unregulated, while lightspeed is regulated by Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) among others. eOption serves 10,000+ clients worldwide; lightspeed has 142,500+. The minimum deposit is $500 at eOption and $250 at lightspeed.

lightspeed wins this category
FeatureeOptionlightspeed
Min. Deposit$500$250
RegulationUnregulatedFinancial Conduct Authority (FCA), Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC), Dubai Financial Services Authority (DFSA), Pepperstone Markets Limited is incorporated in The Bahamas (number 177174 B), Licensed by the Securities Commission of The Bahamas (SCB) number SIA-F269
Founded20082014
CountryUSAUSA
Clients10,000+142,500+

Fees

Fees are a critical factor when choosing between eOption and lightspeed, directly affecting your bottom line as a trader. lightspeed has a lower barrier to entry with a minimum deposit of $250 (vs $500 at eOption). Both brokers charge withdrawal fees. lightspeed applies inactivity fees on dormant accounts; eOption does not. eOption charges deposit fees; lightspeed does not. The two brokers are broadly comparable on fee structure.

Tied
FeatureeOptionlightspeed
Min. Deposit$500$250
Withdrawal FeesYesYes
Inactivity FeesNoYes
Deposit FeesYesNo
CFD FeesNoNo

Platforms

eOption offers MT4, MT5, cTrader, while lightspeed supports MT4, MT5, cTrader. Both brokers provide mobile trading apps for iOS and Android. lightspeed supports social and copy trading features, which eOption does not offer. The two brokers are closely matched on platform offering.

Tied
FeatureeOptionlightspeed
MT4YesYes
MT5YesYes
cTraderYesYes
Windows AppYesYes
iOS AppYesYes
Android AppYesYes
Trading PlatformsDealBook (Desktop, Mobile, iPhone, iPad, iPod touch, Web)MT4, MT5, Mac, ZuluTrade, Web Trader, cTrader, Tablet & Mobile apps

Education & Research

Education and research tools help traders at every level make more informed decisions, and here's how eOption and lightspeed compare. lightspeed runs regular live webinars; eOption does not. Both provide video tutorials. lightspeed publishes daily market commentary; eOption does not. Both integrate third-party research tools. lightspeed maintains an archive of past webinars for on-demand viewing. lightspeed scores higher overall in education and research.

lightspeed wins this category
FeatureeOptionlightspeed
Forex EducationYesYes
CFD EducationNoYes
Weekly WebinarsNoYes
Daily CommentaryNoYes
Trading CentralNoYes
AutochartistYesYes

Deposits & Withdrawals

Convenient deposit and withdrawal options reduce friction for traders, especially important when managing positions across time zones. eOption accepts 2 of the tracked payment methods (bank transfer, credit/debit card), while lightspeed supports 5 (bank transfer, credit/debit card, PayPal, Skrill, Neteller). lightspeed uniquely supports PayPal and Skrill and Neteller among the two brokers. lightspeed scores higher on deposit and withdrawal flexibility.

lightspeed wins this category
FeatureeOptionlightspeed
Bank TransferYesYes
Credit CardYesYes
PayPalNoYes
SkrillNoYes
NetellerNoYes

Support

Responsive customer support matters most when you're locked out of your account or need urgent help with a trade. Both eOption and lightspeed offer live chat support. Both provide phone support. Email support is available at both brokers. eOption supports 2 languages and lightspeed supports 8, giving lightspeed broader global reach. Both brokers are comparable on support quality.

Tied
FeatureeOptionlightspeed
Live ChatYesYes
Phone SupportYesYes
Email SupportYesYes
LanguagesEnglish, and ChineseEnglish, Spanish, Polish, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, Vietnamese, and Arabic