B

eOption

4.7/10
fbs inc logo

fbs inc

7.7/10
3/10RegulationWinner10/10
0/10FeesWinner1/10
9/10WinnerPlatforms7/10
4/10Education & ResearchWinner6/10
4/10Deposits & WithdrawalsWinner10/10
10/10SupportTied10/10

BrokerDataNet earns affiliate commission from brokers listed on this site. This does not affect our ratings or editorial independence.

Overview

eOption was founded in 2008 and is headquartered in USA, while fbs inc was established in 2018 and is based in Australia. eOption holds licences including Unregulated, while fbs inc is regulated by Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) among others. eOption serves 10,000+ clients worldwide; fbs inc has 10,000+. The minimum deposit is $500 at eOption and $250 at fbs inc.

fbs inc wins this category
FeatureeOptionfbs inc
Min. Deposit$500$250
RegulationUnregulatedFinancial Conduct Authority (FCA), Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC), Dubai Financial Services Authority (DFSA), Pepperstone Markets Limited is incorporated in The Bahamas (number 177174 B), Licensed by the Securities Commission of The Bahamas (SCB) number SIA-F225
Founded20082018
CountryUSAAustralia
Clients10,000+10,000+

Fees

Fees are a critical factor when choosing between eOption and fbs inc, directly affecting your bottom line as a trader. fbs inc has a lower barrier to entry with a minimum deposit of $250 (vs $500 at eOption). eOption charges withdrawal fees while fbs inc does not, a notable advantage for frequent withdrawers. eOption charges deposit fees; fbs inc does not. Overall, fbs inc scores higher on fees in our assessment.

fbs inc wins this category
FeatureeOptionfbs inc
Min. Deposit$500$250
Withdrawal FeesYesNo
Inactivity FeesNoNo
Deposit FeesYesNo
CFD FeesNoNo

Platforms

eOption offers MT4, MT5, cTrader, while fbs inc supports MT5, cTrader. Both brokers provide mobile trading apps for iOS and Android. fbs inc supports social and copy trading features, which eOption does not offer. eOption edges ahead on platform breadth and functionality in our scoring.

eOption wins this category
FeatureeOptionfbs inc
MT4YesNo
MT5YesYes
cTraderYesYes
Windows AppYesYes
iOS AppYesYes
Android AppYesYes
Trading PlatformsDealBook (Desktop, Mobile, iPhone, iPad, iPod touch, Web)MT4, MT5, Mac, ZuluTrade, Web Trader, cTrader, Tablet & Mobile apps

Education & Research

Education and research tools help traders at every level make more informed decisions, and here's how eOption and fbs inc compare. fbs inc runs regular live webinars; eOption does not. Both provide video tutorials. fbs inc publishes daily market commentary; eOption does not. Both integrate third-party research tools. fbs inc maintains an archive of past webinars for on-demand viewing. fbs inc scores higher overall in education and research.

fbs inc wins this category
FeatureeOptionfbs inc
Forex EducationYesNo
CFD EducationNoYes
Weekly WebinarsNoYes
Daily CommentaryNoYes
Trading CentralNoYes
AutochartistYesNo

Deposits & Withdrawals

Convenient deposit and withdrawal options reduce friction for traders, especially important when managing positions across time zones. eOption accepts 2 of the tracked payment methods (bank transfer, credit/debit card), while fbs inc supports 5 (bank transfer, credit/debit card, PayPal, Skrill, Neteller). fbs inc uniquely supports PayPal and Skrill and Neteller among the two brokers. fbs inc scores higher on deposit and withdrawal flexibility.

fbs inc wins this category
FeatureeOptionfbs inc
Bank TransferYesYes
Credit CardYesYes
PayPalNoYes
SkrillNoYes
NetellerNoYes

Support

Responsive customer support matters most when you're locked out of your account or need urgent help with a trade. Both eOption and fbs inc offer live chat support. Both provide phone support. Email support is available at both brokers. eOption supports 2 languages and fbs inc supports 8, giving fbs inc broader global reach. Both brokers are comparable on support quality.

Tied
FeatureeOptionfbs inc
Live ChatYesYes
Phone SupportYesYes
Email SupportYesYes
LanguagesEnglish, and ChineseEnglish, Spanish, Polish, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, Vietnamese, and Arabic