B
Direct FX logo

Direct FX

6.9/10

turbo forex

3.4/10
3/10RegulationTied3/10
10/10WinnerFees0/10
9/10WinnerPlatforms0/10
6/10WinnerEducation & Research0/10
4/10Deposits & WithdrawalsWinner10/10
10/10SupportTied10/10

BrokerDataNet earns affiliate commission from brokers listed on this site. This does not affect our ratings or editorial independence.

Overview

Direct FX was founded in 2006 and is headquartered in New Zealand, while turbo forex was established in 2016 and is based in United States. Direct FX holds licences including Unregulated, while turbo forex is regulated by Your capital is at risk. among others. Direct FX serves 10,000+ clients worldwide; turbo forex has 14,000+. The minimum deposit is $1 at Direct FX and $250 at turbo forex.

Direct FX wins this category
FeatureDirect FXturbo forex
Min. Deposit$1$250
RegulationUnregulatedYour capital is at risk.
Founded20062016
CountryNew ZealandUnited States
Clients10,000+14,000+

Fees

Fees are a critical factor when choosing between Direct FX and turbo forex, directly affecting your bottom line as a trader. Direct FX has a lower barrier to entry with a minimum deposit of $1 (vs $250 at turbo forex). turbo forex charges withdrawal fees while Direct FX does not, giving Direct FX an edge for frequent withdrawers. turbo forex applies inactivity fees on dormant accounts; Direct FX does not. Direct FX charges deposit fees; turbo forex does not. Overall, Direct FX scores higher on fees in our assessment.

Direct FX wins this category
FeatureDirect FXturbo forex
Min. Deposit$1$250
Withdrawal FeesNoYes
Inactivity FeesNoYes
Deposit FeesYesYes
CFD FeesYesYes

Platforms

Direct FX offers a mobile trading app; mobile availability for turbo forex is limited. Direct FX supports social and copy trading features, which turbo forex does not offer. Direct FX edges ahead on platform breadth and functionality in our scoring.

Direct FX wins this category
FeatureDirect FXturbo forex
MT4YesNo
MT5YesNo
cTraderYesNo
Windows AppYesNo
iOS AppYesNo
Android AppYesNo
Trading PlatformsNot availableMT4, MT5, Mac, ZuluTrade, Web Trader, cTrader, Tablet & Mobile apps

Education & Research

Education and research tools help traders at every level make more informed decisions, and here's how Direct FX and turbo forex compare. Direct FX runs regular live webinars; turbo forex does not. Direct FX has a video library; turbo forex does not. Direct FX publishes daily market commentary; turbo forex does not. Direct FX integrates third-party research tools (Trading Central); turbo forex does not. Direct FX maintains an archive of past webinars for on-demand viewing. Direct FX scores higher overall in education and research.

Direct FX wins this category
FeatureDirect FXturbo forex
Forex EducationNoNo
CFD EducationYesNo
Weekly WebinarsYesNo
Daily CommentaryYesNo
Trading CentralYesNo
AutochartistNoNo

Deposits & Withdrawals

Convenient deposit and withdrawal options reduce friction for traders, especially important when managing positions across time zones. Direct FX accepts 2 of the tracked payment methods (bank transfer, credit/debit card), while turbo forex supports 5 (bank transfer, credit/debit card, PayPal, Skrill, Neteller). turbo forex uniquely supports PayPal and Skrill and Neteller among the two brokers. turbo forex scores higher on deposit and withdrawal flexibility.

turbo forex wins this category
FeatureDirect FXturbo forex
Bank TransferYesYes
Credit CardYesYes
PayPalNoYes
SkrillNoYes
NetellerNoYes

Support

Responsive customer support matters most when you're locked out of your account or need urgent help with a trade. Both Direct FX and turbo forex offer live chat support. Both provide phone support. Email support is available at both brokers. Direct FX supports 2 languages and turbo forex supports 8, giving turbo forex broader global reach. Both brokers are comparable on support quality.

Tied
FeatureDirect FXturbo forex
Live ChatYesYes
Phone SupportYesYes
Email SupportYesYes
LanguagesEnglish, and ChineseEnglish, Spanish, Polish, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, Vietnamese, and Arabic