Direct FX
Invast Global
BrokerDataNet earns affiliate commission from brokers listed on this site. This does not affect our ratings or editorial independence.
Overview
Direct FX was founded in 2006 and is headquartered in New Zealand, while Invast Global was established in 1960 and is based in Australia. Direct FX holds licences including Unregulated, while Invast Global is regulated by Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC) among others. Direct FX serves 10,000+ clients worldwide; Invast Global has 10,000+. The minimum deposit is $1 at Direct FX and $25000 at Invast Global.
| Feature | Direct FX | Invast Global |
|---|---|---|
| Min. Deposit | $1 | $25000 |
| Regulation | Unregulated | Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC) |
| Founded | 2006 | 1960 |
| Country | New Zealand | Australia |
| Clients | 10,000+ | 10,000+ |
Fees
Fees are a critical factor when choosing between Direct FX and Invast Global, directly affecting your bottom line as a trader. Direct FX has a lower barrier to entry with a minimum deposit of $1 (vs $25000 at Invast Global). Neither broker charges withdrawal fees. Direct FX charges deposit fees; Invast Global does not. Overall, Direct FX scores higher on fees in our assessment.
| Feature | Direct FX | Invast Global |
|---|---|---|
| Min. Deposit | $1 | $25000 |
| Withdrawal Fees | No | No |
| Inactivity Fees | No | No |
| Deposit Fees | Yes | No |
| CFD Fees | Yes | No |
Platforms
Direct FX offers MT4, MT5, cTrader, while Invast Global supports MT4, MT5, cTrader. Both brokers provide mobile trading apps for iOS and Android. Direct FX supports social and copy trading features, which Invast Global does not offer. The two brokers are closely matched on platform offering.
| Feature | Direct FX | Invast Global |
|---|---|---|
| MT4 | Yes | Yes |
| MT5 | Yes | Yes |
| cTrader | Yes | Yes |
| Windows App | Yes | Yes |
| iOS App | Yes | Yes |
| Android App | Yes | Yes |
| Trading Platforms | Not available | MT4, |
Education & Research
Education and research tools help traders at every level make more informed decisions, and here's how Direct FX and Invast Global compare. Direct FX runs regular live webinars; Invast Global does not. Both provide video tutorials. Direct FX publishes daily market commentary; Invast Global does not. Both integrate third-party research tools. Direct FX maintains an archive of past webinars for on-demand viewing. Direct FX scores higher overall in education and research.
| Feature | Direct FX | Invast Global |
|---|---|---|
| Forex Education | No | Yes |
| CFD Education | Yes | No |
| Weekly Webinars | Yes | No |
| Daily Commentary | Yes | No |
| Trading Central | Yes | No |
| Autochartist | No | Yes |
Deposits & Withdrawals
Convenient deposit and withdrawal options reduce friction for traders, especially important when managing positions across time zones. Direct FX accepts 2 of the tracked payment methods (bank transfer, credit/debit card), while Invast Global supports 2 (bank transfer, credit/debit card). Both brokers support the same set of payment methods.
| Feature | Direct FX | Invast Global |
|---|---|---|
| Bank Transfer | Yes | Yes |
| Credit Card | Yes | Yes |
| PayPal | No | No |
| Skrill | No | No |
| Neteller | No | No |
Support
Responsive customer support matters most when you're locked out of your account or need urgent help with a trade. Both Direct FX and Invast Global offer live chat support. Both provide phone support. Email support is available at both brokers. Both brokers offer support in 2 languages. Both brokers are comparable on support quality.
| Feature | Direct FX | Invast Global |
|---|---|---|
| Live Chat | Yes | Yes |
| Phone Support | Yes | Yes |
| Email Support | Yes | Yes |
| Languages | English, and Chinese | English, and Chinese |