B
Direct FX logo

Direct FX

6.9/10

IC Markets

8/10
3/10RegulationWinner9/10
10/10WinnerFees6/10
9/10PlatformsTied9/10
6/10Education & ResearchWinner10/10
4/10Deposits & WithdrawalsWinner10/10
10/10SupportTied10/10

BrokerDataNet earns affiliate commission from brokers listed on this site. This does not affect our ratings or editorial independence.

Overview

Direct FX was founded in 2006 and is headquartered in New Zealand, while IC Markets was established in 2007 and is based in Australia. Direct FX holds licences including Unregulated, while IC Markets is regulated by Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC) among others. Direct FX serves 10,000+ clients worldwide; IC Markets has 60,000+. The minimum deposit is $1 at Direct FX and $200 at IC Markets.

IC Markets wins this category
FeatureDirect FXIC Markets
Min. Deposit$1$200
RegulationUnregulatedAustralian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC), Financial Services Authority (FSA), Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC)
Founded20062007
CountryNew ZealandAustralia
Clients10,000+60,000+

Fees

Fees are a critical factor when choosing between Direct FX and IC Markets, directly affecting your bottom line as a trader. Direct FX has a lower barrier to entry with a minimum deposit of $1 (vs $200 at IC Markets). Neither broker charges withdrawal fees. Direct FX charges deposit fees; IC Markets does not. Overall, Direct FX scores higher on fees in our assessment.

Direct FX wins this category
FeatureDirect FXIC Markets
Min. Deposit$1$200
Withdrawal FeesNoNo
Inactivity FeesNoNo
Deposit FeesYesYes
CFD FeesYesYes

Platforms

Direct FX offers MT4, MT5, cTrader, while IC Markets supports MT4, MT5, cTrader. Both brokers provide mobile trading apps for iOS and Android. Both brokers support copy or social trading, catering to less hands-on investors. The two brokers are closely matched on platform offering.

Tied
FeatureDirect FXIC Markets
MT4YesYes
MT5YesYes
cTraderYesYes
Windows AppYesYes
iOS AppYesYes
Android AppYesYes
Trading PlatformsNot availableMT4, MT5, Mirror Trader, ZuluTrade, Web Trader, cTrader, Mac

Education & Research

Education and research tools help traders at every level make more informed decisions, and here's how Direct FX and IC Markets compare. Both brokers run regular live webinars. Both provide video tutorials, including advanced content. Daily market commentary is available from both brokers. Both integrate third-party research tools including Trading Central. Archived webinars are available at both brokers for self-paced learning. IC Markets scores higher overall in education and research.

IC Markets wins this category
FeatureDirect FXIC Markets
Forex EducationNoYes
CFD EducationYesYes
Weekly WebinarsYesYes
Daily CommentaryYesYes
Trading CentralYesYes
AutochartistNoYes

Deposits & Withdrawals

Convenient deposit and withdrawal options reduce friction for traders, especially important when managing positions across time zones. Direct FX accepts 2 of the tracked payment methods (bank transfer, credit/debit card), while IC Markets supports 5 (bank transfer, credit/debit card, PayPal, Skrill, Neteller). IC Markets uniquely supports PayPal and Skrill and Neteller among the two brokers. IC Markets scores higher on deposit and withdrawal flexibility.

IC Markets wins this category
FeatureDirect FXIC Markets
Bank TransferYesYes
Credit CardYesYes
PayPalNoYes
SkrillNoYes
NetellerNoYes

Support

Responsive customer support matters most when you're locked out of your account or need urgent help with a trade. Both Direct FX and IC Markets offer live chat support. Both provide phone support. Email support is available at both brokers. Direct FX supports 2 languages and IC Markets supports 8, giving IC Markets broader global reach. Both brokers are comparable on support quality.

Tied
FeatureDirect FXIC Markets
Live ChatYesYes
Phone SupportYesYes
Email SupportYesYes
LanguagesEnglish, and ChineseEnglish, Japanese, Chinese, Polish, Afrikans, Danish, Dutch, German and more