B

City Of Investment

5.1/10

onetrade

7.6/10
5/10RegulationWinner10/10
0/10FeesWinner1/10
9/10PlatformsTied9/10
4/10Education & ResearchTied4/10
4/10Deposits & WithdrawalsWinner10/10
10/10SupportTied10/10

BrokerDataNet earns affiliate commission from brokers listed on this site. This does not affect our ratings or editorial independence.

Overview

City Of Investment was founded in 2009 and is headquartered in United Kingdom, while onetrade was established in 2011 and is based in Russia. City Of Investment holds licences including Financial Markets Authority (FMA), while onetrade is regulated by Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) among others. City Of Investment serves 10,000+ clients worldwide; onetrade has 142,500+. The minimum deposit is $3000 at City Of Investment and $250 at onetrade.

onetrade wins this category
FeatureCity Of Investmentonetrade
Min. Deposit$3000$250
RegulationFinancial Markets Authority (FMA)Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC), Dubai Financial Services Authority (DFSA), Pepperstone Markets Limited is incorporated in The Bahamas (number 177174 B), Licensed by the Securities Commission of The Bahamas (SCB) number SIA-F290
Founded20092011
CountryUnited KingdomRussia
Clients10,000+142,500+

Fees

Fees are a critical factor when choosing between City Of Investment and onetrade, directly affecting your bottom line as a trader. onetrade has a lower barrier to entry with a minimum deposit of $250 (vs $3000 at City Of Investment). City Of Investment charges withdrawal fees while onetrade does not, a notable advantage for frequent withdrawers. City Of Investment applies inactivity fees on dormant accounts; onetrade does not. City Of Investment charges deposit fees; onetrade does not. Overall, onetrade scores higher on fees in our assessment.

onetrade wins this category
FeatureCity Of Investmentonetrade
Min. Deposit$3000$250
Withdrawal FeesYesNo
Inactivity FeesYesNo
Deposit FeesYesNo
CFD FeesYesNo

Platforms

City Of Investment offers MT4, MT5, cTrader, while onetrade supports MT4, MT5, cTrader. Both brokers provide mobile trading apps for iOS and Android. The two brokers are closely matched on platform offering.

Tied
FeatureCity Of Investmentonetrade
MT4YesYes
MT5YesYes
cTraderYesYes
Windows AppYesYes
iOS AppYesYes
Android AppYesYes
Trading PlatformsAndroid Apps,iPhone/iPad,DesktopMT4, MT5, Mac, ZuluTrade, Web Trader, cTrader, Tablet & Mobile apps

Education & Research

Education and research tools help traders at every level make more informed decisions, and here's how City Of Investment and onetrade compare. Both provide video tutorials. Both integrate third-party research tools. The two brokers are evenly matched on educational content.

Tied
FeatureCity Of Investmentonetrade
Forex EducationYesYes
CFD EducationNoNo
Weekly WebinarsNoNo
Daily CommentaryNoNo
Trading CentralNoNo
AutochartistYesYes

Deposits & Withdrawals

Convenient deposit and withdrawal options reduce friction for traders, especially important when managing positions across time zones. City Of Investment accepts 2 of the tracked payment methods (bank transfer, credit/debit card), while onetrade supports 5 (bank transfer, credit/debit card, PayPal, Skrill, Neteller). onetrade uniquely supports PayPal and Skrill and Neteller among the two brokers. onetrade scores higher on deposit and withdrawal flexibility.

onetrade wins this category
FeatureCity Of Investmentonetrade
Bank TransferYesYes
Credit CardYesYes
PayPalNoYes
SkrillNoYes
NetellerNoYes

Support

Responsive customer support matters most when you're locked out of your account or need urgent help with a trade. Both City Of Investment and onetrade offer live chat support. Both provide phone support. Email support is available at both brokers. City Of Investment supports 2 languages and onetrade supports 8, giving onetrade broader global reach. Both brokers are comparable on support quality.

Tied
FeatureCity Of Investmentonetrade
Live ChatYesYes
Phone SupportYesYes
Email SupportYesYes
LanguagesEnglish, and ChineseEnglish, Spanish, Polish, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, Vietnamese, and Arabic