B

City Of Investment

5.1/10
Hugos Way logo

Hugos Way

8.2/10
5/10RegulationTied5/10
0/10FeesWinner10/10
9/10PlatformsWinner10/10
4/10Education & ResearchWinner9/10
4/10Deposits & WithdrawalsWinner6/10
10/10SupportTied10/10

BrokerDataNet earns affiliate commission from brokers listed on this site. This does not affect our ratings or editorial independence.

Overview

City Of Investment was founded in 2009 and is headquartered in United Kingdom, while Hugos Way was established in 2017 and is based in St. Vincent and the Grenadines. City Of Investment holds licences including Financial Markets Authority (FMA), while Hugos Way is regulated by Unregulated among others. City Of Investment serves 10,000+ clients worldwide; Hugos Way has 14,000+. The minimum deposit is $3000 at City Of Investment and $50 at Hugos Way.

Hugos Way wins this category
FeatureCity Of InvestmentHugos Way
Min. Deposit$3000$50
RegulationFinancial Markets Authority (FMA)Unregulated
Founded20092017
CountryUnited KingdomSt. Vincent and the Grenadines
Clients10,000+14,000+

Fees

Fees are a critical factor when choosing between City Of Investment and Hugos Way, directly affecting your bottom line as a trader. City Of Investment has a lower barrier to entry with a minimum deposit of $3000 (vs $50 at Hugos Way). City Of Investment charges withdrawal fees while Hugos Way does not, a notable advantage for frequent withdrawers. City Of Investment applies inactivity fees on dormant accounts; Hugos Way does not. City Of Investment charges deposit fees; Hugos Way does not. Overall, Hugos Way scores higher on fees in our assessment.

Hugos Way wins this category
FeatureCity Of InvestmentHugos Way
Min. Deposit$3000$50
Withdrawal FeesYesNo
Inactivity FeesYesNo
Deposit FeesYesNo
CFD FeesYesNo

Platforms

City Of Investment offers MT4, MT5, cTrader, while Hugos Way supports MT4, MT5, cTrader, a proprietary platform. Both brokers provide mobile trading apps for iOS and Android. Hugos Way supports social and copy trading features, which City Of Investment does not offer. Hugos Way edges ahead on platform breadth and functionality in our scoring.

Hugos Way wins this category
FeatureCity Of InvestmentHugos Way
MT4YesYes
MT5YesYes
cTraderYesYes
Windows AppYesYes
iOS AppYesYes
Android AppYesYes
Trading PlatformsAndroid Apps,iPhone/iPad,DesktopMT4, Mirror Trader, Web Trader, Tablet & Mobile apps

Education & Research

Education and research tools help traders at every level make more informed decisions, and here's how City Of Investment and Hugos Way compare. Both provide video tutorials. Hugos Way publishes daily market commentary; City Of Investment does not. Both integrate third-party research tools. Hugos Way maintains an archive of past webinars for on-demand viewing. Hugos Way scores higher overall in education and research.

Hugos Way wins this category
FeatureCity Of InvestmentHugos Way
Forex EducationYesYes
CFD EducationNoYes
Weekly WebinarsNoNo
Daily CommentaryNoYes
Trading CentralNoYes
AutochartistYesYes

Deposits & Withdrawals

Convenient deposit and withdrawal options reduce friction for traders, especially important when managing positions across time zones. City Of Investment accepts 2 of the tracked payment methods (bank transfer, credit/debit card), while Hugos Way supports 3 (bank transfer, credit/debit card, Neteller). Hugos Way uniquely supports Neteller among the two brokers. Hugos Way scores higher on deposit and withdrawal flexibility.

Hugos Way wins this category
FeatureCity Of InvestmentHugos Way
Bank TransferYesYes
Credit CardYesYes
PayPalNoNo
SkrillNoNo
NetellerNoYes

Support

Responsive customer support matters most when you're locked out of your account or need urgent help with a trade. Both City Of Investment and Hugos Way offer live chat support. Both provide phone support. Email support is available at both brokers. Both brokers offer support in 2 languages. Both brokers are comparable on support quality.

Tied
FeatureCity Of InvestmentHugos Way
Live ChatYesYes
Phone SupportYesYes
Email SupportYesYes
LanguagesEnglish, and ChineseEnglish, and Chinese