B

City Of Investment

5.1/10

Hargreaves Lansdown

7/10
5/10RegulationWinner7/10
0/10FeesWinner8/10
9/10PlatformsTied9/10
4/10Education & ResearchWinner6/10
4/10Deposits & WithdrawalsTied4/10
10/10SupportTied10/10

BrokerDataNet earns affiliate commission from brokers listed on this site. This does not affect our ratings or editorial independence.

Overview

City Of Investment was founded in 2009 and is headquartered in United Kingdom, while Hargreaves Lansdown was established in 1981 and is based in UK. City Of Investment holds licences including Financial Markets Authority (FMA), while Hargreaves Lansdown is regulated by Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) among others. City Of Investment serves 10,000+ clients worldwide; Hargreaves Lansdown has 10,000+. The minimum deposit is $3000 at City Of Investment and $200 at Hargreaves Lansdown.

Hargreaves Lansdown wins this category
FeatureCity Of InvestmentHargreaves Lansdown
Min. Deposit$3000$200
RegulationFinancial Markets Authority (FMA)Financial Conduct Authority (FCA)
Founded20091981
CountryUnited KingdomUK
Clients10,000+10,000+

Fees

Fees are a critical factor when choosing between City Of Investment and Hargreaves Lansdown, directly affecting your bottom line as a trader. Hargreaves Lansdown has a lower barrier to entry with a minimum deposit of $200 (vs $3000 at City Of Investment). City Of Investment charges withdrawal fees while Hargreaves Lansdown does not, a notable advantage for frequent withdrawers. City Of Investment applies inactivity fees on dormant accounts; Hargreaves Lansdown does not. City Of Investment charges deposit fees; Hargreaves Lansdown does not. Overall, Hargreaves Lansdown scores higher on fees in our assessment.

Hargreaves Lansdown wins this category
FeatureCity Of InvestmentHargreaves Lansdown
Min. Deposit$3000$200
Withdrawal FeesYesNo
Inactivity FeesYesNo
Deposit FeesYesNo
CFD FeesYesYes

Platforms

City Of Investment offers MT4, MT5, cTrader, while Hargreaves Lansdown supports MT4, MT5, cTrader. Both brokers provide mobile trading apps for iOS and Android. The two brokers are closely matched on platform offering.

Tied
FeatureCity Of InvestmentHargreaves Lansdown
MT4YesYes
MT5YesYes
cTraderYesYes
Windows AppYesYes
iOS AppYesYes
Android AppYesYes
Trading PlatformsAndroid Apps,iPhone/iPad,DesktopWeb Trader, Tablet & Mobile apps

Education & Research

Education and research tools help traders at every level make more informed decisions, and here's how City Of Investment and Hargreaves Lansdown compare. Hargreaves Lansdown runs regular live webinars; City Of Investment does not. Both provide video tutorials. Hargreaves Lansdown publishes daily market commentary; City Of Investment does not. Both integrate third-party research tools. Hargreaves Lansdown maintains an archive of past webinars for on-demand viewing. Hargreaves Lansdown scores higher overall in education and research.

Hargreaves Lansdown wins this category
FeatureCity Of InvestmentHargreaves Lansdown
Forex EducationYesNo
CFD EducationNoYes
Weekly WebinarsNoYes
Daily CommentaryNoYes
Trading CentralNoYes
AutochartistYesNo

Deposits & Withdrawals

Convenient deposit and withdrawal options reduce friction for traders, especially important when managing positions across time zones. City Of Investment accepts 2 of the tracked payment methods (bank transfer, credit/debit card), while Hargreaves Lansdown supports 2 (bank transfer, credit/debit card). Both brokers support the same set of payment methods.

Tied
FeatureCity Of InvestmentHargreaves Lansdown
Bank TransferYesYes
Credit CardYesYes
PayPalNoNo
SkrillNoNo
NetellerNoNo

Support

Responsive customer support matters most when you're locked out of your account or need urgent help with a trade. Both City Of Investment and Hargreaves Lansdown offer live chat support. Both provide phone support. Email support is available at both brokers. Both brokers offer support in 2 languages. Both brokers are comparable on support quality.

Tied
FeatureCity Of InvestmentHargreaves Lansdown
Live ChatYesYes
Phone SupportYesYes
Email SupportYesYes
LanguagesEnglish, and ChineseEnglish, and Chinese