B
City Index logo

City Index

7.6/10

Daw Trading

6.7/10
10/10WinnerRegulation7/10
8/10FeesTied8/10
9/10WinnerPlatforms7/10
0/10Education & ResearchWinner6/10
6.5/10WinnerDeposits & Withdrawals4/10
10/10SupportTied10/10

BrokerDataNet earns affiliate commission from brokers listed on this site. This does not affect our ratings or editorial independence.

Overview

City Index was founded in 1983 and is headquartered in UK, while Daw Trading was established in 1988 and is based in USA. Both brokers are regulated by Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), among other authorities. City Index serves 14,000+ clients worldwide; Daw Trading has 10,000+. The minimum deposit is $25 at City Index and $100 at Daw Trading.

City Index wins this category
FeatureCity IndexDaw Trading
Min. Deposit$25$100
RegulationFinancial Conduct Authority (FCA), Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC), Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS)Financial Conduct Authority (FCA)
Founded19831988
CountryUKUSA
Clients14,000+10,000+

Fees

Fees are a critical factor when choosing between City Index and Daw Trading, directly affecting your bottom line as a trader. Daw Trading has a lower barrier to entry with a minimum deposit of $100 (vs $25 at City Index). City Index charges withdrawal fees while Daw Trading does not, a notable advantage for frequent withdrawers. City Index applies inactivity fees on dormant accounts; Daw Trading does not. City Index charges deposit fees; Daw Trading does not. The two brokers are broadly comparable on fee structure.

Tied
FeatureCity IndexDaw Trading
Min. Deposit$25$100
Withdrawal FeesYesNo
Inactivity FeesYesNo
Deposit FeesYesNo
CFD FeesYesNo

Platforms

City Index offers MT4, MT5, cTrader, while Daw Trading supports MT5, cTrader. Both brokers provide mobile trading apps for iOS and Android. City Index supports social and copy trading features, which Daw Trading does not offer. City Index edges ahead on platform breadth and functionality in our scoring.

City Index wins this category
FeatureCity IndexDaw Trading
MT4YesNo
MT5YesYes
cTraderYesYes
Windows AppYesYes
iOS AppYesYes
Android AppYesYes
Trading PlatformsMT4, Web Trader, Tablet & Mobile appsAndroid,WEB,Desktop,iPhone,Mac

Education & Research

Education and research tools help traders at every level make more informed decisions, and here's how City Index and Daw Trading compare. Daw Trading runs regular live webinars; City Index does not. Daw Trading has a video library; City Index does not. Daw Trading publishes daily market commentary; City Index does not. Daw Trading integrates third-party research tools (Trading Central); City Index does not. Daw Trading maintains an archive of past webinars for on-demand viewing. Daw Trading scores higher overall in education and research.

Daw Trading wins this category
FeatureCity IndexDaw Trading
Forex EducationNoNo
CFD EducationNoYes
Weekly WebinarsNoYes
Daily CommentaryNoYes
Trading CentralNoYes
AutochartistNoNo

Deposits & Withdrawals

Convenient deposit and withdrawal options reduce friction for traders, especially important when managing positions across time zones. City Index accepts 3 of the tracked payment methods (bank transfer, credit/debit card, PayPal), while Daw Trading supports 2 (bank transfer, credit/debit card). City Index uniquely supports PayPal among the two brokers. City Index scores higher on deposit and withdrawal flexibility.

City Index wins this category
FeatureCity IndexDaw Trading
Bank TransferYesYes
Credit CardYesYes
PayPalYesNo
SkrillNoNo
NetellerNoNo

Support

Responsive customer support matters most when you're locked out of your account or need urgent help with a trade. Both City Index and Daw Trading offer live chat support. Both provide phone support. Email support is available at both brokers. City Index supports 6 languages and Daw Trading supports 2, giving City Index broader global reach. Both brokers are comparable on support quality.

Tied
FeatureCity IndexDaw Trading
Live ChatYesYes
Phone SupportYesYes
Email SupportYesYes
LanguagesEnglish, Spanish, German, Arabic, Polish, and ChineseEnglish, and Chinese