B
Charles Schwab logo

Charles Schwab

7.5/10

z.com

7.9/10
7/10RegulationTied7/10
10/10FeesTied10/10
9/10PlatformsTied9/10
4/10Education & ResearchWinner10/10
4/10Deposits & WithdrawalsTied4/10
10/10SupportTied10/10

BrokerDataNet earns affiliate commission from brokers listed on this site. This does not affect our ratings or editorial independence.

Overview

Charles Schwab was founded in 2010 and is headquartered in United States, while z.com was established in 2008 and is based in UK. Charles Schwab holds licences including Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), while z.com is regulated by Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) among others. Charles Schwab serves 10,000+ clients worldwide; z.com has 10,000+. The minimum deposit is $25 at Charles Schwab and $50 at z.com.

z.com wins this category
FeatureCharles Schwabz.com
Min. Deposit$25$50
RegulationCommodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC)Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), Financial Services Authority (FSA), Securities and Futures Commission (SFC)
Founded20102008
CountryUnited StatesUK
Clients10,000+10,000+

Fees

Fees are a critical factor when choosing between Charles Schwab and z.com, directly affecting your bottom line as a trader. Charles Schwab has a lower barrier to entry with a minimum deposit of $25 (vs $50 at z.com). Both brokers charge withdrawal fees. Charles Schwab applies inactivity fees on dormant accounts; z.com does not. z.com charges deposit fees; Charles Schwab does not. The two brokers are broadly comparable on fee structure.

Tied
FeatureCharles Schwabz.com
Min. Deposit$25$50
Withdrawal FeesYesYes
Inactivity FeesYesNo
Deposit FeesNoYes
CFD FeesNoYes

Platforms

Charles Schwab offers MT4, MT5, cTrader, while z.com supports MT4, MT5, cTrader. Both brokers provide mobile trading apps for iOS and Android. Both brokers support copy or social trading, catering to less hands-on investors. The two brokers are closely matched on platform offering.

Tied
FeatureCharles Schwabz.com
MT4YesYes
MT5YesYes
cTraderYesYes
Windows AppYesYes
iOS AppYesYes
Android AppYesYes
Trading PlatformsAndroid,WEB,Desktop,iPhone,MacDesktop,Android,Tablet,iPhone

Education & Research

Education and research tools help traders at every level make more informed decisions, and here's how Charles Schwab and z.com compare. z.com runs regular live webinars; Charles Schwab does not. Both provide video tutorials. z.com publishes daily market commentary; Charles Schwab does not. Both integrate third-party research tools. z.com maintains an archive of past webinars for on-demand viewing. z.com scores higher overall in education and research.

z.com wins this category
FeatureCharles Schwabz.com
Forex EducationYesYes
CFD EducationNoYes
Weekly WebinarsNoYes
Daily CommentaryNoYes
Trading CentralNoYes
AutochartistYesYes

Deposits & Withdrawals

Convenient deposit and withdrawal options reduce friction for traders, especially important when managing positions across time zones. Charles Schwab accepts 2 of the tracked payment methods (bank transfer, credit/debit card), while z.com supports 2 (bank transfer, credit/debit card). Both brokers support the same set of payment methods.

Tied
FeatureCharles Schwabz.com
Bank TransferYesYes
Credit CardYesYes
PayPalNoNo
SkrillNoNo
NetellerNoNo

Support

Responsive customer support matters most when you're locked out of your account or need urgent help with a trade. Both Charles Schwab and z.com offer live chat support. Both provide phone support. Email support is available at both brokers. Both brokers offer support in 2 languages. Both brokers are comparable on support quality.

Tied
FeatureCharles Schwabz.com
Live ChatYesYes
Phone SupportYesYes
Email SupportYesYes
LanguagesEnglish, and ChineseEnglish, and Chinese