
Charles Schwab

Circle Markets
BrokerDataNet earns affiliate commission from brokers listed on this site. This does not affect our ratings or editorial independence.
Overview
Charles Schwab was founded in 2010 and is headquartered in United States, while Circle Markets was established in 2007 and is based in New Zealand. Charles Schwab holds licences including Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), while Circle Markets is regulated by Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) among others. Charles Schwab serves 10,000+ clients worldwide; Circle Markets has 10,000+. The minimum deposit is $25 at Charles Schwab and $100 at Circle Markets.
| Feature | Charles Schwab | Circle Markets |
|---|---|---|
| Min. Deposit | $25 | $100 |
| Regulation | Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) | Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) |
| Founded | 2010 | 2007 |
| Country | United States | New Zealand |
| Clients | 10,000+ | 10,000+ |
Fees
Fees are a critical factor when choosing between Charles Schwab and Circle Markets, directly affecting your bottom line as a trader. Circle Markets has a lower barrier to entry with a minimum deposit of $100 (vs $25 at Charles Schwab). Both brokers charge withdrawal fees. Charles Schwab applies inactivity fees on dormant accounts; Circle Markets does not. Circle Markets charges deposit fees; Charles Schwab does not. Overall, Charles Schwab scores higher on fees in our assessment.
| Feature | Charles Schwab | Circle Markets |
|---|---|---|
| Min. Deposit | $25 | $100 |
| Withdrawal Fees | Yes | Yes |
| Inactivity Fees | Yes | No |
| Deposit Fees | No | Yes |
| CFD Fees | No | No |
Platforms
Charles Schwab offers MT4, MT5, cTrader, while Circle Markets supports MT4, MT5, cTrader. Both brokers provide mobile trading apps for iOS and Android. Charles Schwab supports social and copy trading features, which Circle Markets does not offer. The two brokers are closely matched on platform offering.
| Feature | Charles Schwab | Circle Markets |
|---|---|---|
| MT4 | Yes | Yes |
| MT5 | Yes | Yes |
| cTrader | Yes | Yes |
| Windows App | Yes | Yes |
| iOS App | Yes | Yes |
| Android App | Yes | Yes |
| Trading Platforms | Android,WEB,Desktop,iPhone,Mac | Desktop, Tablet & Mobile apps |
Education & Research
Education and research tools help traders at every level make more informed decisions, and here's how Charles Schwab and Circle Markets compare. Circle Markets runs regular live webinars; Charles Schwab does not. Both provide video tutorials. Circle Markets publishes daily market commentary; Charles Schwab does not. Both integrate third-party research tools. Circle Markets maintains an archive of past webinars for on-demand viewing. Circle Markets scores higher overall in education and research.
| Feature | Charles Schwab | Circle Markets |
|---|---|---|
| Forex Education | Yes | No |
| CFD Education | No | Yes |
| Weekly Webinars | No | Yes |
| Daily Commentary | No | Yes |
| Trading Central | No | Yes |
| Autochartist | Yes | No |
Deposits & Withdrawals
Convenient deposit and withdrawal options reduce friction for traders, especially important when managing positions across time zones. Charles Schwab accepts 2 of the tracked payment methods (bank transfer, credit/debit card), while Circle Markets supports 2 (bank transfer, credit/debit card). Both brokers support the same set of payment methods.
| Feature | Charles Schwab | Circle Markets |
|---|---|---|
| Bank Transfer | Yes | Yes |
| Credit Card | Yes | Yes |
| PayPal | No | No |
| Skrill | No | No |
| Neteller | No | No |
Support
Responsive customer support matters most when you're locked out of your account or need urgent help with a trade. Both Charles Schwab and Circle Markets offer live chat support. Both provide phone support. Email support is available at both brokers. Both brokers offer support in 2 languages. Both brokers are comparable on support quality.
| Feature | Charles Schwab | Circle Markets |
|---|---|---|
| Live Chat | Yes | Yes |
| Phone Support | Yes | Yes |
| Email Support | Yes | Yes |
| Languages | English, and Chinese | English, and Chinese |