B

Bulbrokers

5.4/10

Trading212

7.1/10
6/10RegulationWinner10/10
6/10FeesWinner10/10
7/10PlatformsWinner9/10
0/10Education & ResearchWinner4/10
4/10Deposits & WithdrawalsWinner8/10
10/10WinnerSupport7/10

BrokerDataNet earns affiliate commission from brokers listed on this site. This does not affect our ratings or editorial independence.

Overview

Bulbrokers was founded in 2000 and is headquartered in Bulgaria, while Trading212 was established in 2006 and is based in UK. Bulbrokers holds licences including Financial Services Authority (FSA), while Trading212 is regulated by Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) among others. Bulbrokers serves 10,000+ clients worldwide; Trading212 has 1,500,000+. The minimum deposit is $100 at Bulbrokers and $1 at Trading212.

Trading212 wins this category
FeatureBulbrokersTrading212
Min. Deposit$100$1
RegulationFinancial Services Authority (FSA)Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), Financial Supervision Commission (FSC)
Founded20002006
CountryBulgariaUK
Clients10,000+1,500,000+

Fees

Fees are a critical factor when choosing between Bulbrokers and Trading212, directly affecting your bottom line as a trader. Trading212 has a lower barrier to entry with a minimum deposit of $1 (vs $100 at Bulbrokers). Neither broker charges withdrawal fees. Bulbrokers applies inactivity fees on dormant accounts; Trading212 does not. Overall, Trading212 scores higher on fees in our assessment.

Trading212 wins this category
FeatureBulbrokersTrading212
Min. Deposit$100$1
Withdrawal FeesNoNo
Inactivity FeesYesNo
Deposit FeesNoNo
CFD FeesYesNo

Platforms

Bulbrokers offers MT5, cTrader, while Trading212 supports MT4, MT5, cTrader. Both brokers provide mobile trading apps for iOS and Android. Trading212 supports social and copy trading features, which Bulbrokers does not offer. Trading212 edges ahead on platform breadth and functionality in our scoring.

Trading212 wins this category
FeatureBulbrokersTrading212
MT4NoYes
MT5YesYes
cTraderYesYes
Windows AppYesYes
iOS AppYesYes
Android AppYesYes
Trading PlatformsMT4, Web Trader, Tablet & Mobile appsMT4, MT5, Web Trader, Tablet & Mobile apps

Education & Research

Education and research tools help traders at every level make more informed decisions, and here's how Bulbrokers and Trading212 compare. Trading212 has a video library; Bulbrokers does not. Trading212 integrates third-party research tools (Autochartist); Bulbrokers does not. Trading212 scores higher overall in education and research.

Trading212 wins this category
FeatureBulbrokersTrading212
Forex EducationNoYes
CFD EducationNoNo
Weekly WebinarsNoNo
Daily CommentaryNoNo
Trading CentralNoNo
AutochartistNoYes

Deposits & Withdrawals

Convenient deposit and withdrawal options reduce friction for traders, especially important when managing positions across time zones. Bulbrokers accepts 2 of the tracked payment methods (bank transfer, credit/debit card), while Trading212 supports 4 (bank transfer, credit/debit card, PayPal, Skrill). Trading212 uniquely supports PayPal and Skrill among the two brokers. Trading212 scores higher on deposit and withdrawal flexibility.

Trading212 wins this category
FeatureBulbrokersTrading212
Bank TransferYesYes
Credit CardYesYes
PayPalNoYes
SkrillNoYes
NetellerNoNo

Support

Responsive customer support matters most when you're locked out of your account or need urgent help with a trade. Both Bulbrokers and Trading212 offer live chat support. Bulbrokers offers phone support; Trading212 does not. Email support is available at both brokers. Bulbrokers supports 2 languages and Trading212 supports 13, giving Trading212 broader global reach. Bulbrokers scores higher overall on customer support in our assessment.

Bulbrokers wins this category
FeatureBulbrokersTrading212
Live ChatYesYes
Phone SupportYesNo
Email SupportYesYes
LanguagesEnglish, and ChineseEnglish, German, Netherlands, Spanish, French, Italian, Polish, Serbian, Norwegian, Swedish, Czech, Romanian, Turkish