B

Bulbrokers

5.4/10
Charles Schwab logo

Charles Schwab

7.5/10
6/10RegulationWinner7/10
6/10FeesWinner10/10
7/10PlatformsWinner9/10
0/10Education & ResearchWinner4/10
4/10Deposits & WithdrawalsTied4/10
10/10SupportTied10/10

BrokerDataNet earns affiliate commission from brokers listed on this site. This does not affect our ratings or editorial independence.

Overview

Bulbrokers was founded in 2000 and is headquartered in Bulgaria, while Charles Schwab was established in 2010 and is based in United States. Bulbrokers holds licences including Financial Services Authority (FSA), while Charles Schwab is regulated by Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) among others. Bulbrokers serves 10,000+ clients worldwide; Charles Schwab has 10,000+. The minimum deposit is $100 at Bulbrokers and $25 at Charles Schwab.

Charles Schwab wins this category
FeatureBulbrokersCharles Schwab
Min. Deposit$100$25
RegulationFinancial Services Authority (FSA)Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC)
Founded20002010
CountryBulgariaUnited States
Clients10,000+10,000+

Fees

Fees are a critical factor when choosing between Bulbrokers and Charles Schwab, directly affecting your bottom line as a trader. Bulbrokers has a lower barrier to entry with a minimum deposit of $100 (vs $25 at Charles Schwab). Charles Schwab charges withdrawal fees while Bulbrokers does not, giving Bulbrokers an edge for frequent withdrawers. Both brokers charge inactivity fees on dormant accounts, worth noting if you trade infrequently. Overall, Charles Schwab scores higher on fees in our assessment.

Charles Schwab wins this category
FeatureBulbrokersCharles Schwab
Min. Deposit$100$25
Withdrawal FeesNoYes
Inactivity FeesYesYes
Deposit FeesNoNo
CFD FeesYesNo

Platforms

Bulbrokers offers MT5, cTrader, while Charles Schwab supports MT4, MT5, cTrader. Both brokers provide mobile trading apps for iOS and Android. Charles Schwab supports social and copy trading features, which Bulbrokers does not offer. Charles Schwab edges ahead on platform breadth and functionality in our scoring.

Charles Schwab wins this category
FeatureBulbrokersCharles Schwab
MT4NoYes
MT5YesYes
cTraderYesYes
Windows AppYesYes
iOS AppYesYes
Android AppYesYes
Trading PlatformsMT4, Web Trader, Tablet & Mobile appsAndroid,WEB,Desktop,iPhone,Mac

Education & Research

Education and research tools help traders at every level make more informed decisions, and here's how Bulbrokers and Charles Schwab compare. Charles Schwab has a video library; Bulbrokers does not. Charles Schwab integrates third-party research tools (Autochartist); Bulbrokers does not. Charles Schwab scores higher overall in education and research.

Charles Schwab wins this category
FeatureBulbrokersCharles Schwab
Forex EducationNoYes
CFD EducationNoNo
Weekly WebinarsNoNo
Daily CommentaryNoNo
Trading CentralNoNo
AutochartistNoYes

Deposits & Withdrawals

Convenient deposit and withdrawal options reduce friction for traders, especially important when managing positions across time zones. Bulbrokers accepts 2 of the tracked payment methods (bank transfer, credit/debit card), while Charles Schwab supports 2 (bank transfer, credit/debit card). Both brokers support the same set of payment methods.

Tied
FeatureBulbrokersCharles Schwab
Bank TransferYesYes
Credit CardYesYes
PayPalNoNo
SkrillNoNo
NetellerNoNo

Support

Responsive customer support matters most when you're locked out of your account or need urgent help with a trade. Both Bulbrokers and Charles Schwab offer live chat support. Both provide phone support. Email support is available at both brokers. Both brokers offer support in 2 languages. Both brokers are comparable on support quality.

Tied
FeatureBulbrokersCharles Schwab
Live ChatYesYes
Phone SupportYesYes
Email SupportYesYes
LanguagesEnglish, and ChineseEnglish, and Chinese