Bridges Financial Services
GDMFX
BrokerDataNet earns affiliate commission from brokers listed on this site. This does not affect our ratings or editorial independence.
Overview
Bridges Financial Services was founded in 2014 and is headquartered in Australia, while GDMFX was established in 2012 and is based in Anguilla. Bridges Financial Services holds licences including ABN 60 003 474 977, while GDMFX is regulated by Unregulated among others. Bridges Financial Services serves 10,000+ clients worldwide; GDMFX has 10,000+. Both brokers share the same minimum deposit of $100.
| Feature | Bridges Financial Services | GDMFX |
|---|---|---|
| Min. Deposit | $100 | $100 |
| Regulation | ABN 60 003 474 977, AFSL No. 240837 | Unregulated |
| Founded | 2014 | 2012 |
| Country | Australia | Anguilla |
| Clients | 10,000+ | 10,000+ |
Fees
Fees are a critical factor when choosing between Bridges Financial Services and GDMFX, directly affecting your bottom line as a trader. Both require a minimum deposit of $100. Bridges Financial Services charges withdrawal fees while GDMFX does not, a notable advantage for frequent withdrawers. Bridges Financial Services charges deposit fees; GDMFX does not. Overall, GDMFX scores higher on fees in our assessment.
| Feature | Bridges Financial Services | GDMFX |
|---|---|---|
| Min. Deposit | $100 | $100 |
| Withdrawal Fees | Yes | No |
| Inactivity Fees | No | No |
| Deposit Fees | Yes | Yes |
| CFD Fees | Yes | Yes |
Platforms
Bridges Financial Services offers MT4, MT5, cTrader, while GDMFX supports MT4, MT5, cTrader. Both brokers provide mobile trading apps for iOS and Android. Both brokers support copy or social trading, catering to less hands-on investors. The two brokers are closely matched on platform offering.
| Feature | Bridges Financial Services | GDMFX |
|---|---|---|
| MT4 | Yes | Yes |
| MT5 | Yes | Yes |
| cTrader | Yes | Yes |
| Windows App | Yes | Yes |
| iOS App | Yes | Yes |
| Android App | Yes | Yes |
| Trading Platforms | MetaTrader 4 | MT4, Web Trader, Tablet & Mobile apps |
Education & Research
Education and research tools help traders at every level make more informed decisions, and here's how Bridges Financial Services and GDMFX compare. Bridges Financial Services runs regular live webinars; GDMFX does not. Both provide video tutorials. Bridges Financial Services publishes daily market commentary; GDMFX does not. Both integrate third-party research tools. Bridges Financial Services maintains an archive of past webinars for on-demand viewing. Bridges Financial Services scores higher overall in education and research.
| Feature | Bridges Financial Services | GDMFX |
|---|---|---|
| Forex Education | Yes | Yes |
| CFD Education | Yes | No |
| Weekly Webinars | Yes | No |
| Daily Commentary | Yes | No |
| Trading Central | Yes | No |
| Autochartist | Yes | Yes |
Deposits & Withdrawals
Convenient deposit and withdrawal options reduce friction for traders, especially important when managing positions across time zones. Bridges Financial Services accepts 2 of the tracked payment methods (bank transfer, credit/debit card), while GDMFX supports 2 (bank transfer, credit/debit card). Both brokers support the same set of payment methods.
| Feature | Bridges Financial Services | GDMFX |
|---|---|---|
| Bank Transfer | Yes | Yes |
| Credit Card | Yes | Yes |
| PayPal | No | No |
| Skrill | No | No |
| Neteller | No | No |
Support
Responsive customer support matters most when you're locked out of your account or need urgent help with a trade. Both Bridges Financial Services and GDMFX offer live chat support. Both provide phone support. Email support is available at both brokers. Both brokers offer support in 2 languages. Both brokers are comparable on support quality.
| Feature | Bridges Financial Services | GDMFX |
|---|---|---|
| Live Chat | Yes | Yes |
| Phone Support | Yes | Yes |
| Email Support | Yes | Yes |
| Languages | English, and Chinese | English, and Chinese |