B

Boston Merchant Financial

6.1/10

Interactive Investor

7/10
7/10RegulationTied7/10
10/10FeesTied10/10
7/10PlatformsWinner9/10
0/10Education & ResearchWinner4/10
4/10Deposits & WithdrawalsTied4/10
10/10SupportTied10/10

BrokerDataNet earns affiliate commission from brokers listed on this site. This does not affect our ratings or editorial independence.

Overview

Boston Merchant Financial was founded in 1988 and is headquartered in Dubai, while Interactive Investor was established in 1995 and is based in UK. Boston Merchant Financial holds licences including Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC), while Interactive Investor is regulated by Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) among others. Boston Merchant Financial serves 10,000+ clients worldwide; Interactive Investor has 10,000+. The minimum deposit is $50 at Boston Merchant Financial and $1 at Interactive Investor.

Interactive Investor wins this category
FeatureBoston Merchant FinancialInteractive Investor
Min. Deposit$50$1
RegulationAustralian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC)Financial Conduct Authority (FCA)
Founded19881995
CountryDubaiUK
Clients10,000+10,000+

Fees

Fees are a critical factor when choosing between Boston Merchant Financial and Interactive Investor, directly affecting your bottom line as a trader. Interactive Investor has a lower barrier to entry with a minimum deposit of $1 (vs $50 at Boston Merchant Financial). Neither broker charges withdrawal fees. Interactive Investor applies inactivity fees on dormant accounts; Boston Merchant Financial does not. The two brokers are broadly comparable on fee structure.

Tied
FeatureBoston Merchant FinancialInteractive Investor
Min. Deposit$50$1
Withdrawal FeesNoNo
Inactivity FeesNoYes
Deposit FeesNoNo
CFD FeesNoNo

Platforms

Boston Merchant Financial offers MT5, cTrader, while Interactive Investor supports MT4, MT5, cTrader. Both brokers provide mobile trading apps for iOS and Android. Both brokers support copy or social trading, catering to less hands-on investors. Interactive Investor edges ahead on platform breadth and functionality in our scoring.

Interactive Investor wins this category
FeatureBoston Merchant FinancialInteractive Investor
MT4NoYes
MT5YesYes
cTraderYesYes
Windows AppYesYes
iOS AppYesYes
Android AppYesYes
Trading PlatformsMT4, Web Trader, Tablet & Mobile appsWeb Trader, ProTrader, Tablet & Mobile apps

Education & Research

Education and research tools help traders at every level make more informed decisions, and here's how Boston Merchant Financial and Interactive Investor compare. Interactive Investor has a video library; Boston Merchant Financial does not. Interactive Investor integrates third-party research tools (Autochartist); Boston Merchant Financial does not. Interactive Investor scores higher overall in education and research.

Interactive Investor wins this category
FeatureBoston Merchant FinancialInteractive Investor
Forex EducationNoYes
CFD EducationNoNo
Weekly WebinarsNoNo
Daily CommentaryNoNo
Trading CentralNoNo
AutochartistNoYes

Deposits & Withdrawals

Convenient deposit and withdrawal options reduce friction for traders, especially important when managing positions across time zones. Boston Merchant Financial accepts 2 of the tracked payment methods (bank transfer, credit/debit card), while Interactive Investor supports 2 (bank transfer, credit/debit card). Both brokers support the same set of payment methods.

Tied
FeatureBoston Merchant FinancialInteractive Investor
Bank TransferYesYes
Credit CardYesYes
PayPalNoNo
SkrillNoNo
NetellerNoNo

Support

Responsive customer support matters most when you're locked out of your account or need urgent help with a trade. Both Boston Merchant Financial and Interactive Investor offer live chat support. Both provide phone support. Email support is available at both brokers. Both brokers offer support in 2 languages. Both brokers are comparable on support quality.

Tied
FeatureBoston Merchant FinancialInteractive Investor
Live ChatYesYes
Phone SupportYesYes
Email SupportYesYes
LanguagesEnglish, and ChineseEnglish, and Chinese