B

BOQ Trading

7.7/10

IC Markets

8/10
9/10RegulationTied9/10
6/10FeesTied6/10
9/10PlatformsTied9/10
10/10Education & ResearchTied10/10
4/10Deposits & WithdrawalsWinner10/10
10/10SupportTied10/10

BrokerDataNet earns affiliate commission from brokers listed on this site. This does not affect our ratings or editorial independence.

Overview

BOQ Trading was founded in 2014 and is headquartered in United States, while IC Markets was established in 2007 and is based in Australia. BOQ Trading holds licences including Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), while IC Markets is regulated by Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC) among others. BOQ Trading serves 10,000+ clients worldwide; IC Markets has 60,000+. Both brokers share the same minimum deposit of $200.

IC Markets wins this category
FeatureBOQ TradingIC Markets
Min. Deposit$200$200
RegulationFinancial Conduct Authority (FCA), Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC)Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC), Financial Services Authority (FSA), Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC)
Founded20142007
CountryUnited StatesAustralia
Clients10,000+60,000+

Fees

Fees are a critical factor when choosing between BOQ Trading and IC Markets, directly affecting your bottom line as a trader. Both require a minimum deposit of $200. Neither broker charges withdrawal fees. BOQ Trading charges deposit fees; IC Markets does not. The two brokers are broadly comparable on fee structure.

Tied
FeatureBOQ TradingIC Markets
Min. Deposit$200$200
Withdrawal FeesNoNo
Inactivity FeesNoNo
Deposit FeesYesYes
CFD FeesYesYes

Platforms

BOQ Trading offers MT4, MT5, cTrader, while IC Markets supports MT4, MT5, cTrader. Both brokers provide mobile trading apps for iOS and Android. Both brokers support copy or social trading, catering to less hands-on investors. The two brokers are closely matched on platform offering.

Tied
FeatureBOQ TradingIC Markets
MT4YesYes
MT5YesYes
cTraderYesYes
Windows AppYesYes
iOS AppYesYes
Android AppYesYes
Trading PlatformsMetaTrader 4,Mac,iPhoneMT4, MT5, Mirror Trader, ZuluTrade, Web Trader, cTrader, Mac

Education & Research

Education and research tools help traders at every level make more informed decisions, and here's how BOQ Trading and IC Markets compare. Both brokers run regular live webinars. Both provide video tutorials, including advanced content. Daily market commentary is available from both brokers. Both integrate third-party research tools including Trading Central. Archived webinars are available at both brokers for self-paced learning. The two brokers are evenly matched on educational content.

Tied
FeatureBOQ TradingIC Markets
Forex EducationYesYes
CFD EducationYesYes
Weekly WebinarsYesYes
Daily CommentaryYesYes
Trading CentralYesYes
AutochartistYesYes

Deposits & Withdrawals

Convenient deposit and withdrawal options reduce friction for traders, especially important when managing positions across time zones. BOQ Trading accepts 2 of the tracked payment methods (bank transfer, credit/debit card), while IC Markets supports 5 (bank transfer, credit/debit card, PayPal, Skrill, Neteller). IC Markets uniquely supports PayPal and Skrill and Neteller among the two brokers. IC Markets scores higher on deposit and withdrawal flexibility.

IC Markets wins this category
FeatureBOQ TradingIC Markets
Bank TransferYesYes
Credit CardYesYes
PayPalNoYes
SkrillNoYes
NetellerNoYes

Support

Responsive customer support matters most when you're locked out of your account or need urgent help with a trade. Both BOQ Trading and IC Markets offer live chat support. Both provide phone support. Email support is available at both brokers. BOQ Trading supports 2 languages and IC Markets supports 8, giving IC Markets broader global reach. Both brokers are comparable on support quality.

Tied
FeatureBOQ TradingIC Markets
Live ChatYesYes
Phone SupportYesYes
Email SupportYesYes
LanguagesEnglish, and ChineseEnglish, Japanese, Chinese, Polish, Afrikans, Danish, Dutch, German and more