Blitzbrokers
Direct FX
BrokerDataNet earns affiliate commission from brokers listed on this site. This does not affect our ratings or editorial independence.
Overview
Blitzbrokers was founded in 1982 and is headquartered in Hong Kong, while Direct FX was established in 2006 and is based in New Zealand. Blitzbrokers holds licences including Securities and Futures Commission (SFC), while Direct FX is regulated by Unregulated among others. Blitzbrokers serves 10,000+ clients worldwide; Direct FX has 10,000+. Both brokers share the same minimum deposit of $1.
| Feature | Blitzbrokers | Direct FX |
|---|---|---|
| Min. Deposit | $1 | $1 |
| Regulation | Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) | Unregulated |
| Founded | 1982 | 2006 |
| Country | Hong Kong | New Zealand |
| Clients | 10,000+ | 10,000+ |
Fees
Fees are a critical factor when choosing between Blitzbrokers and Direct FX, directly affecting your bottom line as a trader. Both require a minimum deposit of $1. Neither broker charges withdrawal fees. Direct FX charges deposit fees; Blitzbrokers does not. The two brokers are broadly comparable on fee structure.
| Feature | Blitzbrokers | Direct FX |
|---|---|---|
| Min. Deposit | $1 | $1 |
| Withdrawal Fees | No | No |
| Inactivity Fees | No | No |
| Deposit Fees | No | Yes |
| CFD Fees | No | Yes |
Platforms
Blitzbrokers offers MT5, cTrader, while Direct FX supports MT4, MT5, cTrader. Both brokers provide mobile trading apps for iOS and Android. Both brokers support copy or social trading, catering to less hands-on investors. Direct FX edges ahead on platform breadth and functionality in our scoring.
| Feature | Blitzbrokers | Direct FX |
|---|---|---|
| MT4 | No | Yes |
| MT5 | Yes | Yes |
| cTrader | Yes | Yes |
| Windows App | Yes | Yes |
| iOS App | Yes | Yes |
| Android App | Yes | Yes |
| Trading Platforms | Desktop,WEB,Android | Not available |
Education & Research
Education and research tools help traders at every level make more informed decisions, and here's how Blitzbrokers and Direct FX compare. Direct FX runs regular live webinars; Blitzbrokers does not. Both provide video tutorials. Direct FX publishes daily market commentary; Blitzbrokers does not. Both integrate third-party research tools. Direct FX maintains an archive of past webinars for on-demand viewing. Direct FX scores higher overall in education and research.
| Feature | Blitzbrokers | Direct FX |
|---|---|---|
| Forex Education | Yes | No |
| CFD Education | No | Yes |
| Weekly Webinars | No | Yes |
| Daily Commentary | No | Yes |
| Trading Central | No | Yes |
| Autochartist | Yes | No |
Deposits & Withdrawals
Convenient deposit and withdrawal options reduce friction for traders, especially important when managing positions across time zones. Blitzbrokers accepts 2 of the tracked payment methods (bank transfer, credit/debit card), while Direct FX supports 2 (bank transfer, credit/debit card). Both brokers support the same set of payment methods.
| Feature | Blitzbrokers | Direct FX |
|---|---|---|
| Bank Transfer | Yes | Yes |
| Credit Card | Yes | Yes |
| PayPal | No | No |
| Skrill | No | No |
| Neteller | No | No |
Support
Responsive customer support matters most when you're locked out of your account or need urgent help with a trade. Both Blitzbrokers and Direct FX offer live chat support. Both provide phone support. Email support is available at both brokers. Both brokers offer support in 2 languages. Both brokers are comparable on support quality.
| Feature | Blitzbrokers | Direct FX |
|---|---|---|
| Live Chat | Yes | Yes |
| Phone Support | Yes | Yes |
| Email Support | Yes | Yes |
| Languages | English, and Chinese | English, and Chinese |