B

Blitzbrokers

6.3/10
Capital SV Investments logo

Capital SV Investments

6.8/10
5/10RegulationTied5/10
10/10WinnerFees6/10
7/10PlatformsWinner9/10
4/10Education & ResearchWinner6/10
4/10Deposits & WithdrawalsTied4/10
10/10SupportTied10/10

BrokerDataNet earns affiliate commission from brokers listed on this site. This does not affect our ratings or editorial independence.

Overview

Blitzbrokers was founded in 1982 and is headquartered in Hong Kong, while Capital SV Investments was established in 1922 and is based in Cyprus. Blitzbrokers holds licences including Securities and Futures Commission (SFC), while Capital SV Investments is regulated by Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC) among others. Blitzbrokers serves 10,000+ clients worldwide; Capital SV Investments has 10,000+. The minimum deposit is $1 at Blitzbrokers and $200 at Capital SV Investments.

Capital SV Investments wins this category
FeatureBlitzbrokersCapital SV Investments
Min. Deposit$1$200
RegulationSecurities and Futures Commission (SFC)Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC)
Founded19821922
CountryHong KongCyprus
Clients10,000+10,000+

Fees

Fees are a critical factor when choosing between Blitzbrokers and Capital SV Investments, directly affecting your bottom line as a trader. Blitzbrokers has a lower barrier to entry with a minimum deposit of $1 (vs $200 at Capital SV Investments). Neither broker charges withdrawal fees. Capital SV Investments applies inactivity fees on dormant accounts; Blitzbrokers does not. Overall, Blitzbrokers scores higher on fees in our assessment.

Blitzbrokers wins this category
FeatureBlitzbrokersCapital SV Investments
Min. Deposit$1$200
Withdrawal FeesNoNo
Inactivity FeesNoYes
Deposit FeesNoNo
CFD FeesNoYes

Platforms

Blitzbrokers offers MT5, cTrader, while Capital SV Investments supports MT4, MT5, cTrader. Both brokers provide mobile trading apps for iOS and Android. Blitzbrokers supports social and copy trading features, which Capital SV Investments does not offer. Capital SV Investments edges ahead on platform breadth and functionality in our scoring.

Capital SV Investments wins this category
FeatureBlitzbrokersCapital SV Investments
MT4NoYes
MT5YesYes
cTraderYesYes
Windows AppYesYes
iOS AppYesYes
Android AppYesYes
Trading PlatformsDesktop,WEB,AndroidMT4 ,Android,iPhone,Mac

Education & Research

Education and research tools help traders at every level make more informed decisions, and here's how Blitzbrokers and Capital SV Investments compare. Capital SV Investments runs regular live webinars; Blitzbrokers does not. Both provide video tutorials. Capital SV Investments publishes daily market commentary; Blitzbrokers does not. Both integrate third-party research tools. Capital SV Investments maintains an archive of past webinars for on-demand viewing. Capital SV Investments scores higher overall in education and research.

Capital SV Investments wins this category
FeatureBlitzbrokersCapital SV Investments
Forex EducationYesNo
CFD EducationNoYes
Weekly WebinarsNoYes
Daily CommentaryNoYes
Trading CentralNoYes
AutochartistYesNo

Deposits & Withdrawals

Convenient deposit and withdrawal options reduce friction for traders, especially important when managing positions across time zones. Blitzbrokers accepts 2 of the tracked payment methods (bank transfer, credit/debit card), while Capital SV Investments supports 2 (bank transfer, credit/debit card). Both brokers support the same set of payment methods.

Tied
FeatureBlitzbrokersCapital SV Investments
Bank TransferYesYes
Credit CardYesYes
PayPalNoNo
SkrillNoNo
NetellerNoNo

Support

Responsive customer support matters most when you're locked out of your account or need urgent help with a trade. Both Blitzbrokers and Capital SV Investments offer live chat support. Both provide phone support. Email support is available at both brokers. Both brokers offer support in 2 languages. Both brokers are comparable on support quality.

Tied
FeatureBlitzbrokersCapital SV Investments
Live ChatYesYes
Phone SupportYesYes
Email SupportYesYes
LanguagesEnglish, and ChineseEnglish, and Chinese