B

Bell Direct

5.6/10

npbfx

7.4/10
3/10RegulationWinner10/10
6/10WinnerFees0/10
7/10PlatformsWinner9/10
6/10WinnerEducation & Research4/10
4/10Deposits & WithdrawalsWinner10/10
10/10SupportTied10/10

BrokerDataNet earns affiliate commission from brokers listed on this site. This does not affect our ratings or editorial independence.

Overview

Bell Direct was founded in 1983 and is headquartered in New Zealand, while npbfx was established in 2020 and is based in United Kingdom. Bell Direct holds licences including Financial Markets Authority (FMA), while npbfx is regulated by Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) among others. Bell Direct serves 10,000+ clients worldwide; npbfx has 3,500,000+. The minimum deposit is $100 at Bell Direct and $250 at npbfx.

npbfx wins this category
FeatureBell Directnpbfx
Min. Deposit$100$250
RegulationFinancial Markets Authority (FMA)Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC), Dubai Financial Services Authority (DFSA), Pepperstone Markets Limited is incorporated in The Bahamas (number 177174 B), Licensed by the Securities Commission of The Bahamas (SCB) number SIA-F287
Founded19832020
CountryNew ZealandUnited Kingdom
Clients10,000+3,500,000+

Fees

Fees are a critical factor when choosing between Bell Direct and npbfx, directly affecting your bottom line as a trader. Bell Direct has a lower barrier to entry with a minimum deposit of $100 (vs $250 at npbfx). Neither broker charges withdrawal fees. Both brokers charge inactivity fees on dormant accounts, worth noting if you trade infrequently. Overall, Bell Direct scores higher on fees in our assessment.

Bell Direct wins this category
FeatureBell Directnpbfx
Min. Deposit$100$250
Withdrawal FeesNoNo
Inactivity FeesYesYes
Deposit FeesNoNo
CFD FeesYesNo

Platforms

Bell Direct offers MT5, cTrader, while npbfx supports MT4, MT5, cTrader. Both brokers provide mobile trading apps for iOS and Android. npbfx supports social and copy trading features, which Bell Direct does not offer. npbfx edges ahead on platform breadth and functionality in our scoring.

npbfx wins this category
FeatureBell Directnpbfx
MT4NoYes
MT5YesYes
cTraderYesYes
Windows AppYesYes
iOS AppYesYes
Android AppYesYes
Trading PlatformsAndroid,WEB,Desktop,iPhone,MacMT4, MT5, Mac, ZuluTrade, Web Trader, cTrader, Tablet & Mobile apps

Education & Research

Education and research tools help traders at every level make more informed decisions, and here's how Bell Direct and npbfx compare. Bell Direct runs regular live webinars; npbfx does not. Both provide video tutorials. Bell Direct publishes daily market commentary; npbfx does not. Both integrate third-party research tools. Bell Direct maintains an archive of past webinars for on-demand viewing. Bell Direct scores higher overall in education and research.

Bell Direct wins this category
FeatureBell Directnpbfx
Forex EducationNoYes
CFD EducationYesNo
Weekly WebinarsYesNo
Daily CommentaryYesNo
Trading CentralYesNo
AutochartistNoYes

Deposits & Withdrawals

Convenient deposit and withdrawal options reduce friction for traders, especially important when managing positions across time zones. Bell Direct accepts 2 of the tracked payment methods (bank transfer, credit/debit card), while npbfx supports 5 (bank transfer, credit/debit card, PayPal, Skrill, Neteller). npbfx uniquely supports PayPal and Skrill and Neteller among the two brokers. npbfx scores higher on deposit and withdrawal flexibility.

npbfx wins this category
FeatureBell Directnpbfx
Bank TransferYesYes
Credit CardYesYes
PayPalNoYes
SkrillNoYes
NetellerNoYes

Support

Responsive customer support matters most when you're locked out of your account or need urgent help with a trade. Both Bell Direct and npbfx offer live chat support. Both provide phone support. Email support is available at both brokers. Bell Direct supports 2 languages and npbfx supports 8, giving npbfx broader global reach. Both brokers are comparable on support quality.

Tied
FeatureBell Directnpbfx
Live ChatYesYes
Phone SupportYesYes
Email SupportYesYes
LanguagesEnglish, and ChineseEnglish, Spanish, Polish, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, Vietnamese, and Arabic