Bell Direct
Blitzbrokers
BrokerDataNet earns affiliate commission from brokers listed on this site. This does not affect our ratings or editorial independence.
Overview
Bell Direct was founded in 1983 and is headquartered in New Zealand, while Blitzbrokers was established in 1982 and is based in Hong Kong. Bell Direct holds licences including Financial Markets Authority (FMA), while Blitzbrokers is regulated by Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) among others. Bell Direct serves 10,000+ clients worldwide; Blitzbrokers has 10,000+. The minimum deposit is $100 at Bell Direct and $1 at Blitzbrokers.
| Feature | Bell Direct | Blitzbrokers |
|---|---|---|
| Min. Deposit | $100 | $1 |
| Regulation | Financial Markets Authority (FMA) | Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) |
| Founded | 1983 | 1982 |
| Country | New Zealand | Hong Kong |
| Clients | 10,000+ | 10,000+ |
Fees
Fees are a critical factor when choosing between Bell Direct and Blitzbrokers, directly affecting your bottom line as a trader. Blitzbrokers has a lower barrier to entry with a minimum deposit of $1 (vs $100 at Bell Direct). Neither broker charges withdrawal fees. Bell Direct applies inactivity fees on dormant accounts; Blitzbrokers does not. Overall, Blitzbrokers scores higher on fees in our assessment.
| Feature | Bell Direct | Blitzbrokers |
|---|---|---|
| Min. Deposit | $100 | $1 |
| Withdrawal Fees | No | No |
| Inactivity Fees | Yes | No |
| Deposit Fees | No | No |
| CFD Fees | Yes | No |
Platforms
Bell Direct offers MT5, cTrader, while Blitzbrokers supports MT5, cTrader. Both brokers provide mobile trading apps for iOS and Android. Blitzbrokers supports social and copy trading features, which Bell Direct does not offer. The two brokers are closely matched on platform offering.
| Feature | Bell Direct | Blitzbrokers |
|---|---|---|
| MT4 | No | No |
| MT5 | Yes | Yes |
| cTrader | Yes | Yes |
| Windows App | Yes | Yes |
| iOS App | Yes | Yes |
| Android App | Yes | Yes |
| Trading Platforms | Android,WEB,Desktop,iPhone,Mac | Desktop,WEB,Android |
Education & Research
Education and research tools help traders at every level make more informed decisions, and here's how Bell Direct and Blitzbrokers compare. Bell Direct runs regular live webinars; Blitzbrokers does not. Both provide video tutorials. Bell Direct publishes daily market commentary; Blitzbrokers does not. Both integrate third-party research tools. Bell Direct maintains an archive of past webinars for on-demand viewing. Bell Direct scores higher overall in education and research.
| Feature | Bell Direct | Blitzbrokers |
|---|---|---|
| Forex Education | No | Yes |
| CFD Education | Yes | No |
| Weekly Webinars | Yes | No |
| Daily Commentary | Yes | No |
| Trading Central | Yes | No |
| Autochartist | No | Yes |
Deposits & Withdrawals
Convenient deposit and withdrawal options reduce friction for traders, especially important when managing positions across time zones. Bell Direct accepts 2 of the tracked payment methods (bank transfer, credit/debit card), while Blitzbrokers supports 2 (bank transfer, credit/debit card). Both brokers support the same set of payment methods.
| Feature | Bell Direct | Blitzbrokers |
|---|---|---|
| Bank Transfer | Yes | Yes |
| Credit Card | Yes | Yes |
| PayPal | No | No |
| Skrill | No | No |
| Neteller | No | No |
Support
Responsive customer support matters most when you're locked out of your account or need urgent help with a trade. Both Bell Direct and Blitzbrokers offer live chat support. Both provide phone support. Email support is available at both brokers. Both brokers offer support in 2 languages. Both brokers are comparable on support quality.
| Feature | Bell Direct | Blitzbrokers |
|---|---|---|
| Live Chat | Yes | Yes |
| Phone Support | Yes | Yes |
| Email Support | Yes | Yes |
| Languages | English, and Chinese | English, and Chinese |