B
Baker Young Stockbrokers logo

Baker Young Stockbrokers

5.2/10

City Of Investment

5.1/10
3/10RegulationWinner5/10
4/10WinnerFees0/10
9/10PlatformsTied9/10
0/10Education & ResearchWinner4/10
4/10Deposits & WithdrawalsTied4/10
10/10SupportTied10/10

BrokerDataNet earns affiliate commission from brokers listed on this site. This does not affect our ratings or editorial independence.

Overview

Baker Young Stockbrokers was founded in 2017 and is headquartered in Australia, while City Of Investment was established in 2009 and is based in United Kingdom. Baker Young Stockbrokers holds licences including Unregulated, while City Of Investment is regulated by Financial Markets Authority (FMA) among others. Baker Young Stockbrokers serves 10,000+ clients worldwide; City Of Investment has 10,000+. The minimum deposit is $200 at Baker Young Stockbrokers and $3000 at City Of Investment.

Baker Young Stockbrokers wins this category
FeatureBaker Young StockbrokersCity Of Investment
Min. Deposit$200$3000
RegulationUnregulatedFinancial Markets Authority (FMA)
Founded20172009
CountryAustraliaUnited Kingdom
Clients10,000+10,000+

Fees

Fees are a critical factor when choosing between Baker Young Stockbrokers and City Of Investment, directly affecting your bottom line as a trader. Baker Young Stockbrokers has a lower barrier to entry with a minimum deposit of $200 (vs $3000 at City Of Investment). Both brokers charge withdrawal fees. City Of Investment applies inactivity fees on dormant accounts; Baker Young Stockbrokers does not. Baker Young Stockbrokers charges deposit fees; City Of Investment does not. Overall, Baker Young Stockbrokers scores higher on fees in our assessment.

Baker Young Stockbrokers wins this category
FeatureBaker Young StockbrokersCity Of Investment
Min. Deposit$200$3000
Withdrawal FeesYesYes
Inactivity FeesNoYes
Deposit FeesYesYes
CFD FeesYesYes

Platforms

Baker Young Stockbrokers offers MT4, MT5, cTrader, while City Of Investment supports MT4, MT5, cTrader. Both brokers provide mobile trading apps for iOS and Android. Baker Young Stockbrokers supports social and copy trading features, which City Of Investment does not offer. The two brokers are closely matched on platform offering.

Tied
FeatureBaker Young StockbrokersCity Of Investment
MT4YesYes
MT5YesYes
cTraderYesYes
Windows AppYesYes
iOS AppYesYes
Android AppYesYes
Trading PlatformsiPhone/iPad,iOS,Android Apps,iPhone/iPad,Desktop

Education & Research

Education and research tools help traders at every level make more informed decisions, and here's how Baker Young Stockbrokers and City Of Investment compare. City Of Investment has a video library; Baker Young Stockbrokers does not. City Of Investment integrates third-party research tools (Autochartist); Baker Young Stockbrokers does not. City Of Investment scores higher overall in education and research.

City Of Investment wins this category
FeatureBaker Young StockbrokersCity Of Investment
Forex EducationNoYes
CFD EducationNoNo
Weekly WebinarsNoNo
Daily CommentaryNoNo
Trading CentralNoNo
AutochartistNoYes

Deposits & Withdrawals

Convenient deposit and withdrawal options reduce friction for traders, especially important when managing positions across time zones. Baker Young Stockbrokers accepts 2 of the tracked payment methods (bank transfer, credit/debit card), while City Of Investment supports 2 (bank transfer, credit/debit card). Both brokers support the same set of payment methods.

Tied
FeatureBaker Young StockbrokersCity Of Investment
Bank TransferYesYes
Credit CardYesYes
PayPalNoNo
SkrillNoNo
NetellerNoNo

Support

Responsive customer support matters most when you're locked out of your account or need urgent help with a trade. Both Baker Young Stockbrokers and City Of Investment offer live chat support. Both provide phone support. Email support is available at both brokers. Both brokers offer support in 2 languages. Both brokers are comparable on support quality.

Tied
FeatureBaker Young StockbrokersCity Of Investment
Live ChatYesYes
Phone SupportYesYes
Email SupportYesYes
LanguagesEnglish, and ChineseEnglish, and Chinese