B

Amscot Stockbroking

3.9/10

z.com

7.9/10
3/10RegulationWinner7/10
0/10FeesWinner10/10
7/10PlatformsWinner9/10
0/10Education & ResearchWinner10/10
4/10Deposits & WithdrawalsTied4/10
10/10SupportTied10/10

BrokerDataNet earns affiliate commission from brokers listed on this site. This does not affect our ratings or editorial independence.

Overview

Amscot Stockbroking was founded in 1853 and is headquartered in Austrailia, while z.com was established in 2008 and is based in UK. Amscot Stockbroking holds licences including Ministry of Economic Affairs and Communications (Estonia), while z.com is regulated by Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) among others. Amscot Stockbroking serves 10,000+ clients worldwide; z.com has 10,000+. The minimum deposit is $500 at Amscot Stockbroking and $50 at z.com.

z.com wins this category
FeatureAmscot Stockbrokingz.com
Min. Deposit$500$50
RegulationMinistry of Economic Affairs and Communications (Estonia)Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), Financial Services Authority (FSA), Securities and Futures Commission (SFC)
Founded18532008
CountryAustrailiaUK
Clients10,000+10,000+

Fees

Fees are a critical factor when choosing between Amscot Stockbroking and z.com, directly affecting your bottom line as a trader. z.com has a lower barrier to entry with a minimum deposit of $50 (vs $500 at Amscot Stockbroking). Both brokers charge withdrawal fees. z.com charges deposit fees; Amscot Stockbroking does not. Overall, z.com scores higher on fees in our assessment.

z.com wins this category
FeatureAmscot Stockbrokingz.com
Min. Deposit$500$50
Withdrawal FeesYesYes
Inactivity FeesNoNo
Deposit FeesNoYes
CFD FeesNoYes

Platforms

Amscot Stockbroking offers MT5, cTrader, while z.com supports MT4, MT5, cTrader. Both brokers provide mobile trading apps for iOS and Android. z.com supports social and copy trading features, which Amscot Stockbroking does not offer. z.com edges ahead on platform breadth and functionality in our scoring.

z.com wins this category
FeatureAmscot Stockbrokingz.com
MT4NoYes
MT5YesYes
cTraderYesYes
Windows AppYesYes
iOS AppYesYes
Android AppYesYes
Trading PlatformsIRESSTrader,IRESSInvestor,netIRESS,XPLANDesktop,Android,Tablet,iPhone

Education & Research

Education and research tools help traders at every level make more informed decisions, and here's how Amscot Stockbroking and z.com compare. z.com runs regular live webinars; Amscot Stockbroking does not. z.com has a video library; Amscot Stockbroking does not. z.com publishes daily market commentary; Amscot Stockbroking does not. z.com integrates third-party research tools (Trading Central, Autochartist); Amscot Stockbroking does not. z.com maintains an archive of past webinars for on-demand viewing. z.com scores higher overall in education and research.

z.com wins this category
FeatureAmscot Stockbrokingz.com
Forex EducationNoYes
CFD EducationNoYes
Weekly WebinarsNoYes
Daily CommentaryNoYes
Trading CentralNoYes
AutochartistNoYes

Deposits & Withdrawals

Convenient deposit and withdrawal options reduce friction for traders, especially important when managing positions across time zones. Amscot Stockbroking accepts 2 of the tracked payment methods (bank transfer, credit/debit card), while z.com supports 2 (bank transfer, credit/debit card). Both brokers support the same set of payment methods.

Tied
FeatureAmscot Stockbrokingz.com
Bank TransferYesYes
Credit CardYesYes
PayPalNoNo
SkrillNoNo
NetellerNoNo

Support

Responsive customer support matters most when you're locked out of your account or need urgent help with a trade. Both Amscot Stockbroking and z.com offer live chat support. Both provide phone support. Email support is available at both brokers. Both brokers offer support in 2 languages. Both brokers are comparable on support quality.

Tied
FeatureAmscot Stockbrokingz.com
Live ChatYesYes
Phone SupportYesYes
Email SupportYesYes
LanguagesEnglish, and ChineseEnglish, and Chinese