B

Amscot Stockbroking

3.9/10

FXCM

7.9/10
3/10RegulationWinner7/10
0/10FeesWinner10/10
7/10PlatformsWinner9/10
0/10Education & ResearchWinner10/10
4/10Deposits & WithdrawalsTied4/10
10/10SupportTied10/10

BrokerDataNet earns affiliate commission from brokers listed on this site. This does not affect our ratings or editorial independence.

Overview

Amscot Stockbroking was founded in 1853 and is headquartered in Austrailia, while FXCM was established in 1999 and is based in United States. Amscot Stockbroking holds licences including Ministry of Economic Affairs and Communications (Estonia), while FXCM is regulated by Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) among others. Amscot Stockbroking serves 10,000+ clients worldwide; FXCM has 10,000+. The minimum deposit is $500 at Amscot Stockbroking and $1 at FXCM.

FXCM wins this category
FeatureAmscot StockbrokingFXCM
Min. Deposit$500$1
RegulationMinistry of Economic Affairs and Communications (Estonia)Financial Conduct Authority (FCA)
Founded18531999
CountryAustrailiaUnited States
Clients10,000+10,000+

Fees

Fees are a critical factor when choosing between Amscot Stockbroking and FXCM, directly affecting your bottom line as a trader. FXCM has a lower barrier to entry with a minimum deposit of $1 (vs $500 at Amscot Stockbroking). Amscot Stockbroking charges withdrawal fees while FXCM does not, a notable advantage for frequent withdrawers. Overall, FXCM scores higher on fees in our assessment.

FXCM wins this category
FeatureAmscot StockbrokingFXCM
Min. Deposit$500$1
Withdrawal FeesYesNo
Inactivity FeesNoNo
Deposit FeesNoNo
CFD FeesNoNo

Platforms

Amscot Stockbroking offers MT5, cTrader, while FXCM supports MT4, MT5, cTrader. Both brokers provide mobile trading apps for iOS and Android. FXCM edges ahead on platform breadth and functionality in our scoring.

FXCM wins this category
FeatureAmscot StockbrokingFXCM
MT4NoYes
MT5YesYes
cTraderYesYes
Windows AppYesYes
iOS AppYesYes
Android AppYesYes
Trading PlatformsIRESSTrader,IRESSInvestor,netIRESS,XPLANMT4, Mirror Trader, Web Trader, NinjaTrader, Tablet & Mobile apps

Education & Research

Education and research tools help traders at every level make more informed decisions, and here's how Amscot Stockbroking and FXCM compare. FXCM runs regular live webinars; Amscot Stockbroking does not. FXCM has a video library; Amscot Stockbroking does not. FXCM publishes daily market commentary; Amscot Stockbroking does not. FXCM integrates third-party research tools (Trading Central, Autochartist); Amscot Stockbroking does not. FXCM maintains an archive of past webinars for on-demand viewing. FXCM scores higher overall in education and research.

FXCM wins this category
FeatureAmscot StockbrokingFXCM
Forex EducationNoYes
CFD EducationNoYes
Weekly WebinarsNoYes
Daily CommentaryNoYes
Trading CentralNoYes
AutochartistNoYes

Deposits & Withdrawals

Convenient deposit and withdrawal options reduce friction for traders, especially important when managing positions across time zones. Amscot Stockbroking accepts 2 of the tracked payment methods (bank transfer, credit/debit card), while FXCM supports 2 (bank transfer, credit/debit card). Both brokers support the same set of payment methods.

Tied
FeatureAmscot StockbrokingFXCM
Bank TransferYesYes
Credit CardYesYes
PayPalNoNo
SkrillNoNo
NetellerNoNo

Support

Responsive customer support matters most when you're locked out of your account or need urgent help with a trade. Both Amscot Stockbroking and FXCM offer live chat support. Both provide phone support. Email support is available at both brokers. Both brokers offer support in 2 languages. Both brokers are comparable on support quality.

Tied
FeatureAmscot StockbrokingFXCM
Live ChatYesYes
Phone SupportYesYes
Email SupportYesYes
LanguagesEnglish, and ChineseEnglish, and Chinese