B

Amscot Stockbroking

3.9/10

City Of Investment

5.1/10
3/10RegulationWinner5/10
0/10FeesTied0/10
7/10PlatformsWinner9/10
0/10Education & ResearchWinner4/10
4/10Deposits & WithdrawalsTied4/10
10/10SupportTied10/10

BrokerDataNet earns affiliate commission from brokers listed on this site. This does not affect our ratings or editorial independence.

Overview

Amscot Stockbroking was founded in 1853 and is headquartered in Austrailia, while City Of Investment was established in 2009 and is based in United Kingdom. Amscot Stockbroking holds licences including Ministry of Economic Affairs and Communications (Estonia), while City Of Investment is regulated by Financial Markets Authority (FMA) among others. Amscot Stockbroking serves 10,000+ clients worldwide; City Of Investment has 10,000+. The minimum deposit is $500 at Amscot Stockbroking and $3000 at City Of Investment.

City Of Investment wins this category
FeatureAmscot StockbrokingCity Of Investment
Min. Deposit$500$3000
RegulationMinistry of Economic Affairs and Communications (Estonia)Financial Markets Authority (FMA)
Founded18532009
CountryAustrailiaUnited Kingdom
Clients10,000+10,000+

Fees

Fees are a critical factor when choosing between Amscot Stockbroking and City Of Investment, directly affecting your bottom line as a trader. City Of Investment has a lower barrier to entry with a minimum deposit of $3000 (vs $500 at Amscot Stockbroking). Both brokers charge withdrawal fees. City Of Investment applies inactivity fees on dormant accounts; Amscot Stockbroking does not. City Of Investment charges deposit fees; Amscot Stockbroking does not. The two brokers are broadly comparable on fee structure.

Tied
FeatureAmscot StockbrokingCity Of Investment
Min. Deposit$500$3000
Withdrawal FeesYesYes
Inactivity FeesNoYes
Deposit FeesNoYes
CFD FeesNoYes

Platforms

Amscot Stockbroking offers MT5, cTrader, while City Of Investment supports MT4, MT5, cTrader. Both brokers provide mobile trading apps for iOS and Android. City Of Investment edges ahead on platform breadth and functionality in our scoring.

City Of Investment wins this category
FeatureAmscot StockbrokingCity Of Investment
MT4NoYes
MT5YesYes
cTraderYesYes
Windows AppYesYes
iOS AppYesYes
Android AppYesYes
Trading PlatformsIRESSTrader,IRESSInvestor,netIRESS,XPLANAndroid Apps,iPhone/iPad,Desktop

Education & Research

Education and research tools help traders at every level make more informed decisions, and here's how Amscot Stockbroking and City Of Investment compare. City Of Investment has a video library; Amscot Stockbroking does not. City Of Investment integrates third-party research tools (Autochartist); Amscot Stockbroking does not. City Of Investment scores higher overall in education and research.

City Of Investment wins this category
FeatureAmscot StockbrokingCity Of Investment
Forex EducationNoYes
CFD EducationNoNo
Weekly WebinarsNoNo
Daily CommentaryNoNo
Trading CentralNoNo
AutochartistNoYes

Deposits & Withdrawals

Convenient deposit and withdrawal options reduce friction for traders, especially important when managing positions across time zones. Amscot Stockbroking accepts 2 of the tracked payment methods (bank transfer, credit/debit card), while City Of Investment supports 2 (bank transfer, credit/debit card). Both brokers support the same set of payment methods.

Tied
FeatureAmscot StockbrokingCity Of Investment
Bank TransferYesYes
Credit CardYesYes
PayPalNoNo
SkrillNoNo
NetellerNoNo

Support

Responsive customer support matters most when you're locked out of your account or need urgent help with a trade. Both Amscot Stockbroking and City Of Investment offer live chat support. Both provide phone support. Email support is available at both brokers. Both brokers offer support in 2 languages. Both brokers are comparable on support quality.

Tied
FeatureAmscot StockbrokingCity Of Investment
Live ChatYesYes
Phone SupportYesYes
Email SupportYesYes
LanguagesEnglish, and ChineseEnglish, and Chinese