B
amarkets logo

amarkets

7.6/10

City Of Investment

5.1/10
10/10WinnerRegulation5/10
0/10FeesTied0/10
9/10PlatformsTied9/10
4/10Education & ResearchTied4/10
10/10WinnerDeposits & Withdrawals4/10
10/10SupportTied10/10

BrokerDataNet earns affiliate commission from brokers listed on this site. This does not affect our ratings or editorial independence.

Overview

amarkets was founded in 2016 and is headquartered in United Kingdom, while City Of Investment was established in 2009 and is based in United Kingdom. amarkets holds licences including Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), while City Of Investment is regulated by Financial Markets Authority (FMA) among others. amarkets serves 1,000,000+ clients worldwide; City Of Investment has 10,000+. The minimum deposit is $250 at amarkets and $3000 at City Of Investment.

amarkets wins this category
FeatureamarketsCity Of Investment
Min. Deposit$250$3000
RegulationFinancial Conduct Authority (FCA), Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC), Dubai Financial Services Authority (DFSA), Pepperstone Markets Limited is incorporated in The Bahamas (number 177174 B), Licensed by the Securities Commission of The Bahamas (SCB) number SIA-F223Financial Markets Authority (FMA)
Founded20162009
CountryUnited KingdomUnited Kingdom
Clients1,000,000+10,000+

Fees

Fees are a critical factor when choosing between amarkets and City Of Investment, directly affecting your bottom line as a trader. amarkets has a lower barrier to entry with a minimum deposit of $250 (vs $3000 at City Of Investment). Both brokers charge withdrawal fees. City Of Investment applies inactivity fees on dormant accounts; amarkets does not. amarkets charges deposit fees; City Of Investment does not. The two brokers are broadly comparable on fee structure.

Tied
FeatureamarketsCity Of Investment
Min. Deposit$250$3000
Withdrawal FeesYesYes
Inactivity FeesNoYes
Deposit FeesYesYes
CFD FeesNoYes

Platforms

amarkets offers MT4, MT5, cTrader, while City Of Investment supports MT4, MT5, cTrader. Both brokers provide mobile trading apps for iOS and Android. The two brokers are closely matched on platform offering.

Tied
FeatureamarketsCity Of Investment
MT4YesYes
MT5YesYes
cTraderYesYes
Windows AppYesYes
iOS AppYesYes
Android AppYesYes
Trading PlatformsMT4, MT5, Mac, ZuluTrade, Web Trader, cTrader, Tablet & Mobile appsAndroid Apps,iPhone/iPad,Desktop

Education & Research

Education and research tools help traders at every level make more informed decisions, and here's how amarkets and City Of Investment compare. Both provide video tutorials. Both integrate third-party research tools. The two brokers are evenly matched on educational content.

Tied
FeatureamarketsCity Of Investment
Forex EducationYesYes
CFD EducationNoNo
Weekly WebinarsNoNo
Daily CommentaryNoNo
Trading CentralNoNo
AutochartistYesYes

Deposits & Withdrawals

Convenient deposit and withdrawal options reduce friction for traders, especially important when managing positions across time zones. amarkets accepts 5 of the tracked payment methods (bank transfer, credit/debit card, PayPal, Skrill, Neteller), while City Of Investment supports 2 (bank transfer, credit/debit card). amarkets uniquely supports PayPal and Skrill and Neteller among the two brokers. amarkets scores higher on deposit and withdrawal flexibility.

amarkets wins this category
FeatureamarketsCity Of Investment
Bank TransferYesYes
Credit CardYesYes
PayPalYesNo
SkrillYesNo
NetellerYesNo

Support

Responsive customer support matters most when you're locked out of your account or need urgent help with a trade. Both amarkets and City Of Investment offer live chat support. Both provide phone support. Email support is available at both brokers. amarkets supports 8 languages and City Of Investment supports 2, giving amarkets broader global reach. Both brokers are comparable on support quality.

Tied
FeatureamarketsCity Of Investment
Live ChatYesYes
Phone SupportYesYes
Email SupportYesYes
LanguagesEnglish, Spanish, Polish, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, Vietnamese, and ArabicEnglish, and Chinese