B
amarkets logo

amarkets

7.6/10
Charles Schwab logo

Charles Schwab

7.5/10
10/10WinnerRegulation7/10
0/10FeesWinner10/10
9/10PlatformsTied9/10
4/10Education & ResearchTied4/10
10/10WinnerDeposits & Withdrawals4/10
10/10SupportTied10/10

BrokerDataNet earns affiliate commission from brokers listed on this site. This does not affect our ratings or editorial independence.

Overview

amarkets was founded in 2016 and is headquartered in United Kingdom, while Charles Schwab was established in 2010 and is based in United States. amarkets holds licences including Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), while Charles Schwab is regulated by Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) among others. amarkets serves 1,000,000+ clients worldwide; Charles Schwab has 10,000+. The minimum deposit is $250 at amarkets and $25 at Charles Schwab.

amarkets wins this category
FeatureamarketsCharles Schwab
Min. Deposit$250$25
RegulationFinancial Conduct Authority (FCA), Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC), Dubai Financial Services Authority (DFSA), Pepperstone Markets Limited is incorporated in The Bahamas (number 177174 B), Licensed by the Securities Commission of The Bahamas (SCB) number SIA-F223Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC)
Founded20162010
CountryUnited KingdomUnited States
Clients1,000,000+10,000+

Fees

Fees are a critical factor when choosing between amarkets and Charles Schwab, directly affecting your bottom line as a trader. Charles Schwab has a lower barrier to entry with a minimum deposit of $25 (vs $250 at amarkets). Both brokers charge withdrawal fees. Charles Schwab applies inactivity fees on dormant accounts; amarkets does not. amarkets charges deposit fees; Charles Schwab does not. Overall, Charles Schwab scores higher on fees in our assessment.

Charles Schwab wins this category
FeatureamarketsCharles Schwab
Min. Deposit$250$25
Withdrawal FeesYesYes
Inactivity FeesNoYes
Deposit FeesYesNo
CFD FeesNoNo

Platforms

amarkets offers MT4, MT5, cTrader, while Charles Schwab supports MT4, MT5, cTrader. Both brokers provide mobile trading apps for iOS and Android. Charles Schwab supports social and copy trading features, which amarkets does not offer. The two brokers are closely matched on platform offering.

Tied
FeatureamarketsCharles Schwab
MT4YesYes
MT5YesYes
cTraderYesYes
Windows AppYesYes
iOS AppYesYes
Android AppYesYes
Trading PlatformsMT4, MT5, Mac, ZuluTrade, Web Trader, cTrader, Tablet & Mobile appsAndroid,WEB,Desktop,iPhone,Mac

Education & Research

Education and research tools help traders at every level make more informed decisions, and here's how amarkets and Charles Schwab compare. Both provide video tutorials. Both integrate third-party research tools. The two brokers are evenly matched on educational content.

Tied
FeatureamarketsCharles Schwab
Forex EducationYesYes
CFD EducationNoNo
Weekly WebinarsNoNo
Daily CommentaryNoNo
Trading CentralNoNo
AutochartistYesYes

Deposits & Withdrawals

Convenient deposit and withdrawal options reduce friction for traders, especially important when managing positions across time zones. amarkets accepts 5 of the tracked payment methods (bank transfer, credit/debit card, PayPal, Skrill, Neteller), while Charles Schwab supports 2 (bank transfer, credit/debit card). amarkets uniquely supports PayPal and Skrill and Neteller among the two brokers. amarkets scores higher on deposit and withdrawal flexibility.

amarkets wins this category
FeatureamarketsCharles Schwab
Bank TransferYesYes
Credit CardYesYes
PayPalYesNo
SkrillYesNo
NetellerYesNo

Support

Responsive customer support matters most when you're locked out of your account or need urgent help with a trade. Both amarkets and Charles Schwab offer live chat support. Both provide phone support. Email support is available at both brokers. amarkets supports 8 languages and Charles Schwab supports 2, giving amarkets broader global reach. Both brokers are comparable on support quality.

Tied
FeatureamarketsCharles Schwab
Live ChatYesYes
Phone SupportYesYes
Email SupportYesYes
LanguagesEnglish, Spanish, Polish, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, Vietnamese, and ArabicEnglish, and Chinese