B

Alvexo

7.2/10

lqdfx

8.4/10
10/10RegulationTied10/10
1/10FeesTied1/10
8/10PlatformsWinner9/10
10/10Education & ResearchTied10/10
8/10Deposits & WithdrawalsWinner10/10
10/10SupportTied10/10

BrokerDataNet earns affiliate commission from brokers listed on this site. This does not affect our ratings or editorial independence.

Overview

Alvexo was founded in 2014 and is headquartered in Cyprus, while lqdfx was established in 2017 and is based in Portugal. Alvexo holds licences including Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC), while lqdfx is regulated by Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) among others. Alvexo serves 10,000+ clients worldwide; lqdfx has 200,000+. The minimum deposit is $500 at Alvexo and $250 at lqdfx.

lqdfx wins this category
FeatureAlvexolqdfx
Min. Deposit$500$250
RegulationAustralian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC), licenced in Australia and Hong Kong for stockbroking and corporate finance activities, Financial Services Authority of Seychelles with License Number SD030Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC), Dubai Financial Services Authority (DFSA), Pepperstone Markets Limited is incorporated in The Bahamas (number 177174 B), Licensed by the Securities Commission of The Bahamas (SCB) number SIA-F272
Founded20142017
CountryCyprusPortugal
Clients10,000+200,000+

Fees

Fees are a critical factor when choosing between Alvexo and lqdfx, directly affecting your bottom line as a trader. lqdfx has a lower barrier to entry with a minimum deposit of $250 (vs $500 at Alvexo). Neither broker charges withdrawal fees. The two brokers are broadly comparable on fee structure.

Tied
FeatureAlvexolqdfx
Min. Deposit$500$250
Withdrawal FeesNoNo
Inactivity FeesNoNo
Deposit FeesNoNo
CFD FeesNoYes

Platforms

Alvexo offers MT4, cTrader, a proprietary platform, while lqdfx supports MT4, MT5, cTrader. Both brokers provide mobile trading apps for iOS and Android. lqdfx edges ahead on platform breadth and functionality in our scoring.

lqdfx wins this category
FeatureAlvexolqdfx
MT4YesYes
MT5NoYes
cTraderYesYes
Windows AppYesYes
iOS AppYesYes
Android AppYesYes
Trading PlatformsMT4, cTrader, Mobile AppsMT4, MT5, Mac, ZuluTrade, Web Trader, cTrader, Tablet & Mobile apps

Education & Research

Education and research tools help traders at every level make more informed decisions, and here's how Alvexo and lqdfx compare. Both brokers run regular live webinars. Both provide video tutorials, including advanced content. Daily market commentary is available from both brokers. Both integrate third-party research tools including Trading Central. Archived webinars are available at both brokers for self-paced learning. The two brokers are evenly matched on educational content.

Tied
FeatureAlvexolqdfx
Forex EducationYesYes
CFD EducationYesYes
Weekly WebinarsYesYes
Daily CommentaryYesYes
Trading CentralYesYes
AutochartistYesYes

Deposits & Withdrawals

Convenient deposit and withdrawal options reduce friction for traders, especially important when managing positions across time zones. Alvexo accepts 4 of the tracked payment methods (bank transfer, credit/debit card, PayPal, Skrill), while lqdfx supports 5 (bank transfer, credit/debit card, PayPal, Skrill, Neteller). lqdfx uniquely supports Neteller among the two brokers. lqdfx scores higher on deposit and withdrawal flexibility.

lqdfx wins this category
FeatureAlvexolqdfx
Bank TransferYesYes
Credit CardYesYes
PayPalYesYes
SkrillYesYes
NetellerNoYes

Support

Responsive customer support matters most when you're locked out of your account or need urgent help with a trade. Both Alvexo and lqdfx offer live chat support. Both provide phone support. Email support is available at both brokers. Alvexo supports 2 languages and lqdfx supports 8, giving lqdfx broader global reach. Both brokers are comparable on support quality.

Tied
FeatureAlvexolqdfx
Live ChatYesYes
Phone SupportYesYes
Email SupportYesYes
LanguagesEnglish, and ChineseEnglish, Spanish, Polish, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, Vietnamese, and Arabic