B
AJ Bell logo

AJ Bell

5.9/10
Bridges Financial Services logo

Bridges Financial Services

6.6/10
5/10WinnerRegulation3/10
8/10WinnerFees4/10
7/10PlatformsWinner9/10
0/10Education & ResearchWinner10/10
4/10Deposits & WithdrawalsTied4/10
10/10SupportTied10/10

BrokerDataNet earns affiliate commission from brokers listed on this site. This does not affect our ratings or editorial independence.

Overview

AJ Bell was founded in 1997 and is headquartered in UK, while Bridges Financial Services was established in 2014 and is based in Australia. AJ Bell holds licences including Central Bank of UAE, while Bridges Financial Services is regulated by ABN 60 003 474 977 among others. AJ Bell serves 10,000+ clients worldwide; Bridges Financial Services has 10,000+. Both brokers share the same minimum deposit of $100.

Bridges Financial Services wins this category
FeatureAJ BellBridges Financial Services
Min. Deposit$100$100
RegulationCentral Bank of UAEABN 60 003 474 977, AFSL No. 240837
Founded19972014
CountryUKAustralia
Clients10,000+10,000+

Fees

Fees are a critical factor when choosing between AJ Bell and Bridges Financial Services, directly affecting your bottom line as a trader. Both require a minimum deposit of $100. Bridges Financial Services charges withdrawal fees while AJ Bell does not, giving AJ Bell an edge for frequent withdrawers. Bridges Financial Services charges deposit fees; AJ Bell does not. Overall, AJ Bell scores higher on fees in our assessment.

AJ Bell wins this category
FeatureAJ BellBridges Financial Services
Min. Deposit$100$100
Withdrawal FeesNoYes
Inactivity FeesNoNo
Deposit FeesNoYes
CFD FeesNoYes

Platforms

AJ Bell offers MT5, cTrader, while Bridges Financial Services supports MT4, MT5, cTrader. Both brokers provide mobile trading apps for iOS and Android. Bridges Financial Services supports social and copy trading features, which AJ Bell does not offer. Bridges Financial Services edges ahead on platform breadth and functionality in our scoring.

Bridges Financial Services wins this category
FeatureAJ BellBridges Financial Services
MT4NoYes
MT5YesYes
cTraderYesYes
Windows AppYesYes
iOS AppYesYes
Android AppYesYes
Trading PlatformsDesktop,Android,iPhone,MacMetaTrader 4

Education & Research

Education and research tools help traders at every level make more informed decisions, and here's how AJ Bell and Bridges Financial Services compare. Bridges Financial Services runs regular live webinars; AJ Bell does not. Bridges Financial Services has a video library; AJ Bell does not. Bridges Financial Services publishes daily market commentary; AJ Bell does not. Bridges Financial Services integrates third-party research tools (Trading Central, Autochartist); AJ Bell does not. Bridges Financial Services maintains an archive of past webinars for on-demand viewing. Bridges Financial Services scores higher overall in education and research.

Bridges Financial Services wins this category
FeatureAJ BellBridges Financial Services
Forex EducationNoYes
CFD EducationNoYes
Weekly WebinarsNoYes
Daily CommentaryNoYes
Trading CentralNoYes
AutochartistNoYes

Deposits & Withdrawals

Convenient deposit and withdrawal options reduce friction for traders, especially important when managing positions across time zones. AJ Bell accepts 2 of the tracked payment methods (bank transfer, credit/debit card), while Bridges Financial Services supports 2 (bank transfer, credit/debit card). Both brokers support the same set of payment methods.

Tied
FeatureAJ BellBridges Financial Services
Bank TransferYesYes
Credit CardYesYes
PayPalNoNo
SkrillNoNo
NetellerNoNo

Support

Responsive customer support matters most when you're locked out of your account or need urgent help with a trade. Both AJ Bell and Bridges Financial Services offer live chat support. Both provide phone support. Email support is available at both brokers. Both brokers offer support in 2 languages. Both brokers are comparable on support quality.

Tied
FeatureAJ BellBridges Financial Services
Live ChatYesYes
Phone SupportYesYes
Email SupportYesYes
LanguagesEnglish, and ChineseEnglish, and Chinese