B

Afluenta Peru Sac

7.3/10

Fidelity

6.4/10
7/10RegulationTied7/10
10/10WinnerFees6/10
9/10WinnerPlatforms7/10
6/10Education & ResearchTied6/10
4/10Deposits & WithdrawalsTied4/10
10/10SupportTied10/10

BrokerDataNet earns affiliate commission from brokers listed on this site. This does not affect our ratings or editorial independence.

Overview

Afluenta Peru Sac was founded in 2013 and is headquartered in Peru, while Fidelity was established in 2008 and is based in USA. Both brokers are regulated by Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), among other authorities. Afluenta Peru Sac serves 10,000+ clients worldwide; Fidelity has 10,000+. The minimum deposit is $0 at Afluenta Peru Sac and $100 at Fidelity.

Afluenta Peru Sac wins this category
FeatureAfluenta Peru SacFidelity
Min. Deposit$0$100
RegulationFinancial Conduct Authority (FCA)Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
Founded20132008
CountryPeruUSA
Clients10,000+10,000+

Fees

Fees are a critical factor when choosing between Afluenta Peru Sac and Fidelity, directly affecting your bottom line as a trader. Afluenta Peru Sac has a lower barrier to entry with a minimum deposit of $0 (vs $100 at Fidelity). Afluenta Peru Sac charges withdrawal fees while Fidelity does not, a notable advantage for frequent withdrawers. Fidelity applies inactivity fees on dormant accounts; Afluenta Peru Sac does not. Afluenta Peru Sac charges deposit fees; Fidelity does not. Overall, Afluenta Peru Sac scores higher on fees in our assessment.

Afluenta Peru Sac wins this category
FeatureAfluenta Peru SacFidelity
Min. Deposit$0$100
Withdrawal FeesYesNo
Inactivity FeesNoYes
Deposit FeesYesNo
CFD FeesNoYes

Platforms

Afluenta Peru Sac offers MT4, MT5, cTrader, while Fidelity supports MT5, cTrader. Both brokers provide mobile trading apps for iOS and Android. Both brokers support copy or social trading, catering to less hands-on investors. Afluenta Peru Sac edges ahead on platform breadth and functionality in our scoring.

Afluenta Peru Sac wins this category
FeatureAfluenta Peru SacFidelity
MT4YesNo
MT5YesYes
cTraderYesYes
Windows AppYesYes
iOS AppYesYes
Android AppYesYes
Trading PlatformsWEB,Desktop,iPhone,MaciPad, iPhone, Android, Windows Phone 8 device, Website, Trader Pro

Education & Research

Education and research tools help traders at every level make more informed decisions, and here's how Afluenta Peru Sac and Fidelity compare. Both brokers run regular live webinars. Both provide video tutorials, including advanced content. Daily market commentary is available from both brokers. Both integrate third-party research tools including Trading Central. Archived webinars are available at both brokers for self-paced learning. The two brokers are evenly matched on educational content.

Tied
FeatureAfluenta Peru SacFidelity
Forex EducationNoNo
CFD EducationYesYes
Weekly WebinarsYesYes
Daily CommentaryYesYes
Trading CentralYesYes
AutochartistNoNo

Deposits & Withdrawals

Convenient deposit and withdrawal options reduce friction for traders, especially important when managing positions across time zones. Afluenta Peru Sac accepts 2 of the tracked payment methods (bank transfer, credit/debit card), while Fidelity supports 2 (bank transfer, credit/debit card). Both brokers support the same set of payment methods.

Tied
FeatureAfluenta Peru SacFidelity
Bank TransferYesYes
Credit CardYesYes
PayPalNoNo
SkrillNoNo
NetellerNoNo

Support

Responsive customer support matters most when you're locked out of your account or need urgent help with a trade. Both Afluenta Peru Sac and Fidelity offer live chat support. Both provide phone support. Email support is available at both brokers. Both brokers offer support in 2 languages. Both brokers are comparable on support quality.

Tied
FeatureAfluenta Peru SacFidelity
Live ChatYesYes
Phone SupportYesYes
Email SupportYesYes
LanguagesEnglish, and ChineseEnglish, and Chinese