B

Abshire Smith

5/10

XM

7.6/10
7/10RegulationWinner9/10
0/10FeesWinner10/10
9/10PlatformsTied9/10
0/10Education & ResearchWinner6/10
4/10Deposits & WithdrawalsWinner6/10
10/10SupportTied10/10

BrokerDataNet earns affiliate commission from brokers listed on this site. This does not affect our ratings or editorial independence.

Overview

Abshire Smith was founded in 1997 and is headquartered in United kingdom, while XM was established in 2009 and is based in Cyprus. Abshire Smith holds licences including Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), while XM is regulated by International Financial Services Commission(IFSC) among others. Abshire Smith serves 10,000+ clients worldwide; XM has 3,500,000+. The minimum deposit is $500 at Abshire Smith and $5 at XM.

XM wins this category
FeatureAbshire SmithXM
Min. Deposit$500$5
RegulationFinancial Conduct Authority (FCA)International Financial Services Commission(IFSC), Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC), Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC)
Founded19972009
CountryUnited kingdomCyprus
Clients10,000+3,500,000+

Fees

Fees are a critical factor when choosing between Abshire Smith and XM, directly affecting your bottom line as a trader. XM has a lower barrier to entry with a minimum deposit of $5 (vs $500 at Abshire Smith). Neither broker charges withdrawal fees. XM applies inactivity fees on dormant accounts; Abshire Smith does not. Abshire Smith charges deposit fees; XM does not. Overall, XM scores higher on fees in our assessment.

XM wins this category
FeatureAbshire SmithXM
Min. Deposit$500$5
Withdrawal FeesNoNo
Inactivity FeesNoYes
Deposit FeesYesNo
CFD FeesNoNo

Platforms

Abshire Smith offers MT4, MT5, cTrader, while XM supports MT4, MT5, cTrader. Both brokers provide mobile trading apps for iOS and Android. Both brokers support copy or social trading, catering to less hands-on investors. The two brokers are closely matched on platform offering.

Tied
FeatureAbshire SmithXM
MT4YesYes
MT5YesYes
cTraderYesYes
Windows AppYesYes
iOS AppYesYes
Android AppYesYes
Trading PlatformsMetaTrader 4, cTrader PlatformMT4, MT5, Mac, Web Trader, Tablet & Mobile apps

Education & Research

Education and research tools help traders at every level make more informed decisions, and here's how Abshire Smith and XM compare. XM runs regular live webinars; Abshire Smith does not. XM has a video library; Abshire Smith does not. XM publishes daily market commentary; Abshire Smith does not. XM integrates third-party research tools (Trading Central); Abshire Smith does not. XM maintains an archive of past webinars for on-demand viewing. XM scores higher overall in education and research.

XM wins this category
FeatureAbshire SmithXM
Forex EducationNoNo
CFD EducationNoYes
Weekly WebinarsNoYes
Daily CommentaryNoYes
Trading CentralNoYes
AutochartistNoNo

Deposits & Withdrawals

Convenient deposit and withdrawal options reduce friction for traders, especially important when managing positions across time zones. Abshire Smith accepts 2 of the tracked payment methods (bank transfer, credit/debit card), while XM supports 3 (bank transfer, credit/debit card, Neteller). XM uniquely supports Neteller among the two brokers. XM scores higher on deposit and withdrawal flexibility.

XM wins this category
FeatureAbshire SmithXM
Bank TransferYesYes
Credit CardYesYes
PayPalNoNo
SkrillNoNo
NetellerNoYes

Support

Responsive customer support matters most when you're locked out of your account or need urgent help with a trade. Both Abshire Smith and XM offer live chat support. Both provide phone support. Email support is available at both brokers. Abshire Smith supports 2 languages and XM supports 20, giving XM broader global reach. Both brokers are comparable on support quality.

Tied
FeatureAbshire SmithXM
Live ChatYesYes
Phone SupportYesYes
Email SupportYesYes
LanguagesEnglish, and ChineseArabic, Chinese, English, French, German, Greek, Hindi, Hungarian, Indonesian, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Malay, Polish, Portuguese, Russian, Spanish, Swedish, Thai, and Turkish