Abshire Smith
XGLOBAL Markets
BrokerDataNet earns affiliate commission from brokers listed on this site. This does not affect our ratings or editorial independence.
Overview
Abshire Smith was founded in 1997 and is headquartered in United kingdom, while XGLOBAL Markets was established in 2008 and is based in Cyprus. Abshire Smith holds licences including Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), while XGLOBAL Markets is regulated by Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC) among others. Abshire Smith serves 10,000+ clients worldwide; XGLOBAL Markets has 10,000+. Both brokers share the same minimum deposit of $500.
| Feature | Abshire Smith | XGLOBAL Markets |
|---|---|---|
| Min. Deposit | $500 | $500 |
| Regulation | Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) | Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC) |
| Founded | 1997 | 2008 |
| Country | United kingdom | Cyprus |
| Clients | 10,000+ | 10,000+ |
Fees
Fees are a critical factor when choosing between Abshire Smith and XGLOBAL Markets, directly affecting your bottom line as a trader. Both require a minimum deposit of $500. XGLOBAL Markets charges withdrawal fees while Abshire Smith does not, giving Abshire Smith an edge for frequent withdrawers. Abshire Smith charges deposit fees; XGLOBAL Markets does not. The two brokers are broadly comparable on fee structure.
| Feature | Abshire Smith | XGLOBAL Markets |
|---|---|---|
| Min. Deposit | $500 | $500 |
| Withdrawal Fees | No | Yes |
| Inactivity Fees | No | No |
| Deposit Fees | Yes | Yes |
| CFD Fees | No | No |
Platforms
Abshire Smith offers MT4, MT5, cTrader, while XGLOBAL Markets supports MT4, MT5, cTrader. Both brokers provide mobile trading apps for iOS and Android. Abshire Smith supports social and copy trading features, which XGLOBAL Markets does not offer. The two brokers are closely matched on platform offering.
| Feature | Abshire Smith | XGLOBAL Markets |
|---|---|---|
| MT4 | Yes | Yes |
| MT5 | Yes | Yes |
| cTrader | Yes | Yes |
| Windows App | Yes | Yes |
| iOS App | Yes | Yes |
| Android App | Yes | Yes |
| Trading Platforms | MetaTrader 4, cTrader Platform | Desktop,iOS,Android |
Education & Research
Education and research tools help traders at every level make more informed decisions, and here's how Abshire Smith and XGLOBAL Markets compare. XGLOBAL Markets has a video library; Abshire Smith does not. XGLOBAL Markets integrates third-party research tools (Autochartist); Abshire Smith does not. XGLOBAL Markets scores higher overall in education and research.
| Feature | Abshire Smith | XGLOBAL Markets |
|---|---|---|
| Forex Education | No | Yes |
| CFD Education | No | No |
| Weekly Webinars | No | No |
| Daily Commentary | No | No |
| Trading Central | No | No |
| Autochartist | No | Yes |
Deposits & Withdrawals
Convenient deposit and withdrawal options reduce friction for traders, especially important when managing positions across time zones. Abshire Smith accepts 2 of the tracked payment methods (bank transfer, credit/debit card), while XGLOBAL Markets supports 2 (bank transfer, credit/debit card). Both brokers support the same set of payment methods.
| Feature | Abshire Smith | XGLOBAL Markets |
|---|---|---|
| Bank Transfer | Yes | Yes |
| Credit Card | Yes | Yes |
| PayPal | No | No |
| Skrill | No | No |
| Neteller | No | No |
Support
Responsive customer support matters most when you're locked out of your account or need urgent help with a trade. Both Abshire Smith and XGLOBAL Markets offer live chat support. Both provide phone support. Email support is available at both brokers. Both brokers offer support in 2 languages. Both brokers are comparable on support quality.
| Feature | Abshire Smith | XGLOBAL Markets |
|---|---|---|
| Live Chat | Yes | Yes |
| Phone Support | Yes | Yes |
| Email Support | Yes | Yes |
| Languages | English, and Chinese | English, and Chinese |