B

Abshire Smith

5/10

umarkets

7/10
7/10RegulationWinner10/10
0/10FeesTied0/10
9/10PlatformsTied9/10
0/10Education & ResearchWinner4/10
4/10Deposits & WithdrawalsWinner10/10
10/10SupportTied10/10

BrokerDataNet earns affiliate commission from brokers listed on this site. This does not affect our ratings or editorial independence.

Overview

Abshire Smith was founded in 1997 and is headquartered in United kingdom, while umarkets was established in 2018 and is based in Bulgaria. Both brokers are regulated by Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), among other authorities. Abshire Smith serves 10,000+ clients worldwide; umarkets has 10,000+. The minimum deposit is $500 at Abshire Smith and $250 at umarkets.

umarkets wins this category
FeatureAbshire Smithumarkets
Min. Deposit$500$250
RegulationFinancial Conduct Authority (FCA)Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC), Dubai Financial Services Authority (DFSA), Pepperstone Markets Limited is incorporated in The Bahamas (number 177174 B), Licensed by the Securities Commission of The Bahamas (SCB) number SIA-F333
Founded19972018
CountryUnited kingdomBulgaria
Clients10,000+10,000+

Fees

Fees are a critical factor when choosing between Abshire Smith and umarkets, directly affecting your bottom line as a trader. umarkets has a lower barrier to entry with a minimum deposit of $250 (vs $500 at Abshire Smith). umarkets charges withdrawal fees while Abshire Smith does not, giving Abshire Smith an edge for frequent withdrawers. umarkets applies inactivity fees on dormant accounts; Abshire Smith does not. Abshire Smith charges deposit fees; umarkets does not. The two brokers are broadly comparable on fee structure.

Tied
FeatureAbshire Smithumarkets
Min. Deposit$500$250
Withdrawal FeesNoYes
Inactivity FeesNoYes
Deposit FeesYesNo
CFD FeesNoNo

Platforms

Abshire Smith offers MT4, MT5, cTrader, while umarkets supports MT4, MT5, cTrader. Both brokers provide mobile trading apps for iOS and Android. Both brokers support copy or social trading, catering to less hands-on investors. The two brokers are closely matched on platform offering.

Tied
FeatureAbshire Smithumarkets
MT4YesYes
MT5YesYes
cTraderYesYes
Windows AppYesYes
iOS AppYesYes
Android AppYesYes
Trading PlatformsMetaTrader 4, cTrader PlatformMT4, MT5, Mac, ZuluTrade, Web Trader, cTrader, Tablet & Mobile apps

Education & Research

Education and research tools help traders at every level make more informed decisions, and here's how Abshire Smith and umarkets compare. umarkets has a video library; Abshire Smith does not. umarkets integrates third-party research tools (Autochartist); Abshire Smith does not. umarkets scores higher overall in education and research.

umarkets wins this category
FeatureAbshire Smithumarkets
Forex EducationNoYes
CFD EducationNoNo
Weekly WebinarsNoNo
Daily CommentaryNoNo
Trading CentralNoNo
AutochartistNoYes

Deposits & Withdrawals

Convenient deposit and withdrawal options reduce friction for traders, especially important when managing positions across time zones. Abshire Smith accepts 2 of the tracked payment methods (bank transfer, credit/debit card), while umarkets supports 5 (bank transfer, credit/debit card, PayPal, Skrill, Neteller). umarkets uniquely supports PayPal and Skrill and Neteller among the two brokers. umarkets scores higher on deposit and withdrawal flexibility.

umarkets wins this category
FeatureAbshire Smithumarkets
Bank TransferYesYes
Credit CardYesYes
PayPalNoYes
SkrillNoYes
NetellerNoYes

Support

Responsive customer support matters most when you're locked out of your account or need urgent help with a trade. Both Abshire Smith and umarkets offer live chat support. Both provide phone support. Email support is available at both brokers. Abshire Smith supports 2 languages and umarkets supports 8, giving umarkets broader global reach. Both brokers are comparable on support quality.

Tied
FeatureAbshire Smithumarkets
Live ChatYesYes
Phone SupportYesYes
Email SupportYesYes
LanguagesEnglish, and ChineseEnglish, Spanish, Polish, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, Vietnamese, and Arabic