Abshire Smith
Nutmeg
BrokerDataNet earns affiliate commission from brokers listed on this site. This does not affect our ratings or editorial independence.
Overview
Abshire Smith was founded in 1997 and is headquartered in United kingdom, while Nutmeg was established in 2008 and is based in USA. Abshire Smith holds licences including Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), while Nutmeg is regulated by Unregulated among others. Abshire Smith serves 10,000+ clients worldwide; Nutmeg has 10,000+. The minimum deposit is $500 at Abshire Smith and $0 at Nutmeg.
| Feature | Abshire Smith | Nutmeg |
|---|---|---|
| Min. Deposit | $500 | $0 |
| Regulation | Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) | Unregulated |
| Founded | 1997 | 2008 |
| Country | United kingdom | USA |
| Clients | 10,000+ | 10,000+ |
Fees
Fees are a critical factor when choosing between Abshire Smith and Nutmeg, directly affecting your bottom line as a trader. Nutmeg has a lower barrier to entry with a minimum deposit of $0 (vs $500 at Abshire Smith). Neither broker charges withdrawal fees. Nutmeg applies inactivity fees on dormant accounts; Abshire Smith does not. Abshire Smith charges deposit fees; Nutmeg does not. Overall, Nutmeg scores higher on fees in our assessment.
| Feature | Abshire Smith | Nutmeg |
|---|---|---|
| Min. Deposit | $500 | $0 |
| Withdrawal Fees | No | No |
| Inactivity Fees | No | Yes |
| Deposit Fees | Yes | No |
| CFD Fees | No | No |
Platforms
Abshire Smith offers MT4, MT5, cTrader, while Nutmeg supports MT4, MT5, cTrader. Both brokers provide mobile trading apps for iOS and Android. Both brokers support copy or social trading, catering to less hands-on investors. The two brokers are closely matched on platform offering.
| Feature | Abshire Smith | Nutmeg |
|---|---|---|
| MT4 | Yes | Yes |
| MT5 | Yes | Yes |
| cTrader | Yes | Yes |
| Windows App | Yes | Yes |
| iOS App | Yes | Yes |
| Android App | Yes | Yes |
| Trading Platforms | MetaTrader 4, cTrader Platform | WebTrader, Desktop, Mobile & Apps |
Education & Research
Education and research tools help traders at every level make more informed decisions, and here's how Abshire Smith and Nutmeg compare. Nutmeg runs regular live webinars; Abshire Smith does not. Nutmeg has a video library; Abshire Smith does not. Nutmeg publishes daily market commentary; Abshire Smith does not. Nutmeg integrates third-party research tools (Trading Central, Autochartist); Abshire Smith does not. Nutmeg maintains an archive of past webinars for on-demand viewing. Nutmeg scores higher overall in education and research.
| Feature | Abshire Smith | Nutmeg |
|---|---|---|
| Forex Education | No | Yes |
| CFD Education | No | Yes |
| Weekly Webinars | No | Yes |
| Daily Commentary | No | Yes |
| Trading Central | No | Yes |
| Autochartist | No | Yes |
Deposits & Withdrawals
Convenient deposit and withdrawal options reduce friction for traders, especially important when managing positions across time zones. Abshire Smith accepts 2 of the tracked payment methods (bank transfer, credit/debit card), while Nutmeg supports 2 (bank transfer, credit/debit card). Both brokers support the same set of payment methods.
| Feature | Abshire Smith | Nutmeg |
|---|---|---|
| Bank Transfer | Yes | Yes |
| Credit Card | Yes | Yes |
| PayPal | No | No |
| Skrill | No | No |
| Neteller | No | No |
Support
Responsive customer support matters most when you're locked out of your account or need urgent help with a trade. Both Abshire Smith and Nutmeg offer live chat support. Both provide phone support. Email support is available at both brokers. Both brokers offer support in 2 languages. Both brokers are comparable on support quality.
| Feature | Abshire Smith | Nutmeg |
|---|---|---|
| Live Chat | Yes | Yes |
| Phone Support | Yes | Yes |
| Email Support | Yes | Yes |
| Languages | English, and Chinese | English, and Chinese |