B

Abshire Smith

5/10
FP Markets logo

FP Markets

8.5/10
7/10RegulationWinner9/10
0/10FeesWinner6/10
9/10PlatformsTied9/10
0/10Education & ResearchWinner6/10
4/10Deposits & WithdrawalsWinner10/10
10/10SupportTied10/10

BrokerDataNet earns affiliate commission from brokers listed on this site. This does not affect our ratings or editorial independence.

Overview

Abshire Smith was founded in 1997 and is headquartered in United kingdom, while FP Markets was established in 2005 and is based in Australia. Abshire Smith holds licences including Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), while FP Markets is regulated by Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC) among others. Abshire Smith serves 10,000+ clients worldwide; FP Markets has 10,000+. The minimum deposit is $500 at Abshire Smith and $100 at FP Markets.

FP Markets wins this category
FeatureAbshire SmithFP Markets
Min. Deposit$500$100
RegulationFinancial Conduct Authority (FCA)Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC), Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC)
Founded19972005
CountryUnited kingdomAustralia
Clients10,000+10,000+

Fees

Fees are a critical factor when choosing between Abshire Smith and FP Markets, directly affecting your bottom line as a trader. FP Markets has a lower barrier to entry with a minimum deposit of $100 (vs $500 at Abshire Smith). Neither broker charges withdrawal fees. Abshire Smith charges deposit fees; FP Markets does not. Overall, FP Markets scores higher on fees in our assessment.

FP Markets wins this category
FeatureAbshire SmithFP Markets
Min. Deposit$500$100
Withdrawal FeesNoNo
Inactivity FeesNoNo
Deposit FeesYesYes
CFD FeesNoYes

Platforms

Abshire Smith offers MT4, MT5, cTrader, while FP Markets supports MT4, MT5, cTrader. Both brokers provide mobile trading apps for iOS and Android. Both brokers support copy or social trading, catering to less hands-on investors. The two brokers are closely matched on platform offering.

Tied
FeatureAbshire SmithFP Markets
MT4YesYes
MT5YesYes
cTraderYesYes
Windows AppYesYes
iOS AppYesYes
Android AppYesYes
Trading PlatformsMetaTrader 4, cTrader PlatformMT4, MT5, IRESS, Mac, Web Trader, Tablet & Mobile apps

Education & Research

Education and research tools help traders at every level make more informed decisions, and here's how Abshire Smith and FP Markets compare. FP Markets runs regular live webinars; Abshire Smith does not. FP Markets has a video library; Abshire Smith does not. FP Markets publishes daily market commentary; Abshire Smith does not. FP Markets integrates third-party research tools (Trading Central); Abshire Smith does not. FP Markets maintains an archive of past webinars for on-demand viewing. FP Markets scores higher overall in education and research.

FP Markets wins this category
FeatureAbshire SmithFP Markets
Forex EducationNoNo
CFD EducationNoYes
Weekly WebinarsNoYes
Daily CommentaryNoYes
Trading CentralNoYes
AutochartistNoNo

Deposits & Withdrawals

Convenient deposit and withdrawal options reduce friction for traders, especially important when managing positions across time zones. Abshire Smith accepts 2 of the tracked payment methods (bank transfer, credit/debit card), while FP Markets supports 5 (bank transfer, credit/debit card, PayPal, Skrill, Neteller). FP Markets uniquely supports PayPal and Skrill and Neteller among the two brokers. FP Markets scores higher on deposit and withdrawal flexibility.

FP Markets wins this category
FeatureAbshire SmithFP Markets
Bank TransferYesYes
Credit CardYesYes
PayPalNoYes
SkrillNoYes
NetellerNoYes

Support

Responsive customer support matters most when you're locked out of your account or need urgent help with a trade. Both Abshire Smith and FP Markets offer live chat support. Both provide phone support. Email support is available at both brokers. Abshire Smith offers multilingual support. Both brokers are comparable on support quality.

Tied
FeatureAbshire SmithFP Markets
Live ChatYesYes
Phone SupportYesYes
Email SupportYesYes
LanguagesEnglish, and ChineseNot available